Tag Archives: Legal

And The Mud Begins To Fly ….

Posted on by
Reply

Over at Adult FYI I read a great story about John Gray (which apparently he got from Blogspot) and well, to put it bluntly, his bull shit stories that he has been putting out over the years as well as some implications of fraud and even some building inspection violations.  Reading this does further prove that something isn’t right with this whole Michael Ninn ordeal but it makes you wonder if this bitter outrage is just going to lead to more trouble for Michael Ninn than it’s worth?  For those who aren’t keeping up this is in regards to Ninn Worx_SR, and owners or former owners Micahel Ninn and John L. Gray, which you can read up on by clicking here.


Ten Questions the Media Needs to Ask Mr. Gray


1.) In your interview with AVN, (By: Wade Garrett Posted: 07/30/2007) you stated: Among the company’s resources are: in-house a legal team; a large IT staff which maintains in-house web services and programming; a graphic arts department; and a full film studio with state-of-the-art equipment headed by Carl Wachter, the longtime Penthouse staff photographer. Mr. Ninn states he never saw an in house legal team that you claim exists. You also claimed in that same interview you had a large IT department but again Mr. Ninn says he never saw more than two people in it. So in your opinion is two people a large IT department?


2) In your interview with AVN, (By: Peter Warren Posted: 02/07/2008) you stated: “The new division is set up as a full-scale movie factory. you were quoted as saying “We have built our own film studio, a 30,000 square-foot building, that is everything that Playboy had at their studio.”


From what we could gather from people that have worked in your SR studio said the studio is closer to 1600 sq.ft and that it had little or no equipment in it. You also stated in the same interview “we have our own editors and replication and sound people, and all the rest of it.” But everyone who has been to your Norco Headquarters say there are no editors, no replication or sound people? Any comments?


3.) In your interview with AVN, By: David Sullivan Posted: 10/09/2007 you stated: “One of the things I’ve always found in porn in general was that perception is very powerful in this industry,” Gray continued. “There’s an incalculable, intangible benefit of sweeping AVN awards and not being just another film company, but being a premiere film company in this industry, and we can afford to do a $250 or $300 thousand budget movie and not make a penny on it, kind of like Bob Guccione did with Caligula, and it has a certain inalienable benefit to us in a long shelf life… but you later stated in a more recent interview you blamed Ninn for making expensive, impractical choices that led to disagreements on everything from color correction to contract girls, public relations, trailers and investing in an Internet presence. What is your real opinion?


4.)In your interview with AVN, By: David Sullivan Posted: 10/09/2007 you stated: )”The Vegas [Spearmint Rhino] club alone does a million dollars a week in gross sales, so it’s easy for us to get a return on the initial investment,” This statement would lead me to believe and others that you own Spearmint Rhino in Las Vegas but in fact you do not. Why would you make such an untrue statement?


5.) In a statement given to Xbiz by your COO Kathy Vercher she stated “We invested in Michael and we invested in Michael’s vision” I could not find any statement of Michael’s vision but I could find yours and I quote “We want to throw enough money at it to be able to do something very, very special. I will spend $25,000 on three minutes, because if it doesn’t look and feel exactly like the 300 movie, I guarantee you it will never hit the street and I will scrap it. What I’m out for is mainstream quality production in the porn arena, and I haven’t seen anybody in history ever do that. We’re gonna do the exact same thing that a DreamWorks studio would do, and we’ve got the money to be able to throw at it.” Who are we to believe here and why is there no money to finish The Four properly now?


6.) Mr. Ninn’s statement to AVN Posted: 06/16/2008 said “He had a problem with your business ethics.” but did not really elaborate. What do you think he meant by this statement?


7.) Mr.Gray, given the fact that you were sued and settled cases out of court in lawsuits brought against Spearmint Rhino by 4 US women for using their pictures on billboards and in literature about striptease without their permission. It is also common knowledge that a world famous Penthouse photographer also sued you for copyright infringement and that you settled out of court. Why would you decorate your Norco office with over 30 Michael Parkes paintings you do not have permission to use?


8.) Is it true the office and the stage you built for Ninn Worx_SR in your corporate office in Norco, never received the proper building inspections and permits and that when the Norco city building inspector arrived at the office all NWSR employees had to run from their offices and hide in the back, because the offices were being occupied illegally?


9.) You have stated in a few of your interviews that “Michael is more of an artist than a businessman and you are more businessman than artist.” including some of the very first interviews you gave to AVN and Luke Ford. So, as the businessman in this relationship how could both you and the COO of SR, Kathy Vercher, blame Michael for any of the failed business decisions when he neither signed the checks or handled the business decisions of NWSR?


10.) Do you think your convictions in the US for offences ranging, from carrying a concealed weapon to writing bad checks and the multiple other lawsuits filed against you will have any effect on your case with Michael Ninn?

Pick your name wisely bitch or it could fucking haunt your ass for life

Posted on by
2

When becoming a porn star it’s really to bad they don’t give a class on how to pick your name.  In reality we know that most girls go into this business for money but what nobody stops to think about or just doesn’t understand is how to BE a porn star.  That is the business end of things.  Let us start with something simple like picking a name.


All to often young starlets pick a name like Peaches or Princess or some weird spelling variation thereof.    Or an even bigger mistake they don’t investigate the name they do pick.  Such is the case with the story of Nikki Jaymes.


I was reading a really fucking funny story today on AdultFYI in which some photographers were complaining about how the pussy of this girl named Nikki Jaymes really smelled bad.  Then there was this other girl who also happened to be a porn star named Nikki Jaymes (and blonde to boot) who was catching shit over it.  People apaprently kept asking how her pussy was and if it really stunk.


So girls let me give you a little bit of advice before becoming a porn star, at least about your name.


Pick a name that is easy to spell.  If you pick a complicated name then it will make marketing your image much harder.  If your name is Candy spell it like Candy not Candee or some other confusing variation.


Pick a first AND a last.  You want to give yourself every chance you have to set yourself a part from the crowd.  Being a successful porn star is about building a brand and to build a brand you need a way to indtify that brand.  There are a lot of Tera Patricks in this world but there is only one Tera Patrick.   There are a lot of girls who go by the name of Jenna in this world but there is only one Jenna Jameson and only one Jenna Haze.


When you pick a name learn to fucking use Google.  Find out if there are any other adult performers or nude models using that name.  Had the young Nikki Jaymes from the AdultFYI story bothered to do that she would have found the other girl and it would have saved her a load of grief a month into her career.


My last bit of advice is to not infringe on any other person’s fame, brand or legal copyright.   This means don’t pick names like Barbie (first or last), Lexus, Mercedes, Toyota or something like Jenna Jamerson or Tera Patricka.  They may seem like popular choices but the second you gain any sort of real fame the people who own the rights to those names will sue your ass off.


A good case in point is Lexus Locklear who got sued by the auto company Lexus and now has to go by Lexi and the countless Barbie lawsuits.


Actually I do have one more bit of advice for you and that is OWN THE RIGHTS TO YOU OWN NAME.  Never -ever- under any circumstances agree to any deal where you the performer doesn’t own the rights to your own name.  Do not let them put it into your contract and do not let them trademark your name.


Pick a name and buy the .com for it BEFORE performing and if there is any talk of trademarking your name, YOU be the trademark holder for your name.


Don’t be a stupid whore …. be a rich one.

What is “obscene”? Are you breaking the law? Aren’t we all?

Posted on by
Reply

With all the shit going down over at Evil Angel I thought it was a good idea to post a little primer on obscenity laws. You can find the data I gathered from from over at Obscenity Crimes.

A Quick Primer on Obscenity Laws
and the First Amendment

I. What is Pornography?

  1. The term “pornography” is a generic, not a legal term. As noted by the Supreme Court in its Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15 (1973) obscenity case:

    “‘Pornography’ derives from the Greek (harlot, and graphos, writing). The word now means ‘1: a description of prostitutes or prostitution 2. a depiction (as in a writing or painting) of licentiousness or lewdness: a portrayal of erotic behavior designed to cause sexual excitement.’ Webster’s Third New International Dictionary [Unabridged 1969]).”

  2. The 1986 Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography defined pornography as, “Material that is predominantly sexually explicit and intended primarily for the purpose of sexual arousal.”

II. What is Obscenity?

The 1973 landmark case, Miller v. California, supra (as modified by two subsequent cases) established a three-pronged test for determining whether a “work” (i.e., material or performance) is obscene and, therefore, unprotected by the First Amendment. To be obscene, a judge and/or a jury must determine:

  1. That the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; AND

  2. That the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable law; AND

  3. That a reasonable person would find that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.

Examples of “hardcore sexual conduct” that an obscenity law could include for regulation under the second prong of the test are patently offensive representations or descriptions of:

  1. Ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated
  2. Masturbation, lewd exhibition of the genitals, excretory functions, and sadomasochistic abuse.

Side note: Typical “hardcore pornography” (e.g., a magazine, video or Web site) consists of little if anything more than one depiction of hardcore sex after the other (i.e., its “wall-to-wall” hardcore sex).

III. Obscenity Is Not Protected by the First Amendment

  1. In Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), the Supreme Court answered the question “whether obscenity is utterance within the area of protected speech and press.” In holding that obscenity is “not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press,” the Roth Court quoted from its earlier Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) decision:

    2. “There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene….[S]uch utterances are of no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.”

  2. In Miller v. California, supra, the Supreme Court said:

    “This much has been categorically settled by the Court, that obscene material is unprotected by the First Amendment. . . . The dissenting Justices sound the alarm of repression. But, in our view, to equate the free and robust exchange of ideas and political debate with commercial exploitation of obscene material demeans the grand conception of the First Amendment and its high purposes in the historic struggle for freedom. It is a ‘misuse of the great guarantees of free speech and free press . . . ‘The protection given speech and press was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political or social changes desired by the people’. . .But the public portrayal of hard-core sexual conduct for its own sake, and for the ensuing commercial gain, is a different matter.” [Emphasis added by Miller Court]

IV. Governmental Justifications for Obscenity Laws

  1. Mr. Justice Harlan, concurring in Roth v. United States, supra, said:

    2. “[E]ven assuming that pornography cannot be deemed ever to cause in an immediate sense, criminal…conduct, other interests within the proper cognizance of the State may be protected by the prohibition placed on such materials. The state can reasonably draw the inference that over a long period of time the indiscriminate dissemination of materials, the essential character of which is to degrade sex, will have an eroding effect on moral standards.”

  2. In Paris Adult Theater I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973), the Supreme Court identified several valid governmental interests that justify a prohibition on obscenity:

  1. “In particular, we hold that there are legitimate state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity, even if it is feasible to enforce effective safeguards against exposure to juveniles and to passersby…These include the interest of the public in the quality of life and total community environment, the tone of commerce in the great city centers, and, possibly, the public safety itself.”
  2. “Although there is no conclusive proof of a connection between antisocial behavior and obscene material, the legislature… could quite reasonably determine that such a connection does or might exist. In deciding Roth, this Court implicitly decided that a legislature could legitimately act on such a conclusion to protect the social interest in order and morality.”
  3. “The sum of experience…affords an ample basis for legislatures to conclude that a sensitive, key relationship of human existence, central to family life, community welfare, and the development of human personality, can be debased and distorted by crass commercial exploitation of sex.”
  4. “As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, there is a ‘right of the Nation and of the states to maintain a decent society.'”

V. Federal Obscenity Laws

Federal laws relating to the crime of obscenity are contained in the following titles and sections of the U.S. Code:

  • 18 U.S.C. 1461 — Mailing obscene matter
  • 18 U.S.C. 1462 — Importation or use of a common carrier to transport obscene matter
  • 18 U.S.C. 1464 — Broadcasting obscene language
  • 18 U.S.C. 1465 — Interstate transportation of obscene matter
  • 18 U.S.C. 1466 — Wholesale and retail sale of obscene matter which has been transported in interstate commerce (must be engaged in business of selling or transferring obscenity)
  • 18 U.S.C. 1468 — Distribution of obscene matter by cable or satellite TV
  • 47 U.S.C. 223 — Making an obscene communication by means of telephone

Sections 1462 and 1465 cited above also prohibit distribution of obscenity on the Internet.

“Dealing in obscene matter” is also a predicate offense under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute. (Title 18, Section 1961-1968).

TO OBTAIN TEXTS OF THESE SECTIONS, GO TO: HTTP://USCODE.HOUSE.GOV

The 93 United States Attorneys—appointed by the President, confirmed by the U.S. Senate and located nationwide (each state has at least one)—are responsible for enforcement of the Federal obscenity laws. The U.S. Attorneys work with the FBI, Postal Inspectors and Customs Officers to enforce Federal obscenity laws.

VI. Obscenity and the Internet

In 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the case of United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 701 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 820 (1996), was presented with the issue of defining “community” in order to determine whether materials that had been transported over the Internet were obscene.

Defendants, a husband and wife, operated a computer bulletin board system (BBS) from their home in California. A postal inspector in Tennessee became a member of their service and subsequently received images by means of a computer and by mail. These materials depicted a wide variety of sexual conduct, including bestiality, torture and excretory fetishism. The couple was convicted by a jury in the Western District of Tennessee for violating federal obscenity laws [18 USC 1462 and 1465] in connection with their operation of their BBS.

The couple appealed the case to the Sixth Circuit. Their appeal was based on the assertion (among other grounds) that the trial venue was improper because it was in Memphis, where undercover Federal agents accessed and downloaded files, not in California; and it was unclear which community’s standards should apply in determining whether the contents of a nationally-accessible BBS are obscene.

In upholding the convictions, the Court of Appeals rejected defendants’ argument that the materials should have been judged by the community standards of California rather than Tennessee. The Court stated (in part): “Furthermore, it is well established that there is no constitutional impediment to the government’s power to prosecute pornography dealers in any district into which the material is sent.”

In 2000, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit invalidated the Child Online Protection Act because the law, which restricts children’s access to obscene-for-minors material on the World Wide Web, uses “community standards” in determining whether sex material is obscene for minors. In 2002, the Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit (Ashcroft v. ACLU, No. 00-1293), with five judges concluding that federal obscenity laws were not unconstitutional as applied to the Internet solely because obscenity laws require application of community standards.

VII. State and Local Obscenity Laws

Workable statewide obscenity laws exist in 40 states. In some states, cities and counties can also enact local obscenity laws. These laws can encompass both obscene materials and performances.

The prosecuting attorney of each county or judicial district (known as district, commonwealth or state’s attorney, etc.) enforces the state obscenity laws. State and local police may make arrests.

Alaska, Maine, New Mexico, Vermont and West Virginia do not have a statewide obscenity law, and Montana and South Dakota have totally ineffective state laws. New obscenity laws are needed in these states.

In Oregon, Colorado and Hawaii, the State Supreme Court either invalidated [Oregon] or greatly weakened the state obscenity laws. Amendments to the State Constitution are needed in these states.

VIII. Other State Laws Regulating Pornography and ‘Adult Uses’

Throughout the country, there are thousands of state laws and local ordinances that regulate the sale and display of pornography and so-called “sexually oriented businesses.” These laws include:

Harmful-to-minors sales and display laws, which restrict minors’ access to materials obscene for minors.

Open booth laws, which require that the doors of “peep show booths” be removed.

Zoning laws, which restrict the location of “adult bookstores,” topless bars, etc.

Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) laws, which prohibit or regulate nudity in bars/bottle clubs.

Nuisance laws, which allow closure of all or part of “adult bookstores” and other “adult” businesses if prostitution, lewd conduct or high-risk sexual conduct occur on the premises.

Obscene device laws, which prohibit the sale of dildos and artificial vaginas.

Public Indecency laws, which require performers in commercial establishments where no alcohol is served or consumed to at least wear “pasties” and “G-strings.”

Sex Supermarket laws, which restrict the number of “adult uses” that can exist at a premises.

Been to Club Vivid lately?

Posted on by
1

Ever heard of Club Vivid? No not the nightclub in Las Vegas that we all partied at the AEE show a year or two ago. I think it was at the Venetian. No, that’s not the club Vivid I speak of. I actually mean another one. Turns out some dumb ass decided to rename his nightclub to Vivid. They describe it as ….

Vivid is San Jose California’s newest and most exclusive mega club that brings South Beach style nightlife to the Bay Area.


Club Vivid


Now here is where things get interesting …….


The real Vivid, you know those guys who own the adult movie company? Well turns out they are pretty pissed that someone is using their trademarked name.

To be exact, Vivid Entertainment claims that the San Jose nightclub with the same name is infringing on the name it’s used for film, Internet, mobile, retail and licensing business for years.


I called the Vivid officers to comment on the matter and a rep from Vivid Entertainment stated they don’t typically comment on litigious matters but will state the law is clear on matters of trademark and IP infringement. I couldn’t get anyone else to comment on the matter despite my best efforts.


I called this Vivid nightclub to try and get a comment. The first time I spoke with a young sounding male who did not identify himself. He was rather short and nasty with his reply stating that he wished us freaky porn people would leave them alone. The Vivid nightclub in San Jose has nothing to do with porno and we wishes we would all just burn in hell. He then hung up. I called back later and spoke to an older sounding gentleman who wishes not to identify himself. He did state however that he was aware of Vivid Video prior to the renaming of the club but did not think the two were similar as one sells stag films while the other is a nightclub. He was not aware of the other Vivid related products including Vivid Comics, Books and footware and most importantly he seemed really surprised to hear that there was a Vivid nightclub in Las Vegas.


What’s most interesting about this ordeal is that the owners of this Vivid nightclub, Diamond S.J. Enterprise filed papers with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to get a registered trademark AFTER getting cease and desist letters from the Vivid Entertainment lawyers.

Vivid Entertainment attorneys said that using the Vivid mark “is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception in the minds of the public.” and as a result Vivid Entertainment is asking for unspecified damages and an injunction against the club owners barring them from using the name.


To say the last this should be a very interesting case of who has the biggest lawyers. Oh that would be Vivid Entertainment you dumb asses. I don’t know what the hell these investors where thinking but clearly this is a case of some stupid fuckers with more money than brains because half a moron could have looked into the trademark issues with the name. DUH.

Texan’s Take POT HEAD to the Extreme

Posted on by
2

The Houston Chronicle today is reporting that three men (two adults, one juvenile) decided to take the concept of Pot Head to the extreme by using an actual skull as a bong to get high. No seriously … the used the fucking skull of a dead man to smoke marijuana?! What the fuck is wrong with these people? These sick little fuckers would dig up bodies, decapitate the body and then use the head to smoke the pot.


Skull used to smoke marijuana


Two men and a juvenile are accused of digging up a corpse, decapitating the body and using the head to smoke marijuana, according to court documents.

Matthew Gonzalez and Kevin Jones have been charged with the misdemeanor offense of abuse of a corpse, said Scott Durfee, a spokesman for the Harris County District Attorneys Office. According to documents filed in the case, Gonzalez, Jones and an unnamed juvenile on March 15 went to an Humble cemetery, dug up a man’s grave, left with the head and turned it into a “bong.”


Gonzalez told authorities about the incident Wednesday, and showed officers the defaced grave, including a 4-foot hole. Because of a heavy rain, officers were unable to determine whether the casket or the body had been disturbed.

Small Town Sheriff Has Some Big City Kinks

Posted on by
Reply

For those who have never heard of Custer County Oklahoma, as of the 2000 census it had 26,142 people. It is mostly white folks and good ‘ole boys who are used to running things their own way. This small town sheriff exemplifies every cliche you ever heard about small town jails by using the inmates as his personal sex slaves. And Joe Francis thought he had it bad down in that Florida jail ….


–AP ARAPAHO, Okla. — The sheriff of Custer County resigned on Wednesday just as federal prosecutors filed 35 felony counts against him for allegedly running a sex-slave operation at the jail.


Mike Burgess quit the position he’d held since 1994 shortly before appearing in court on 14 counts of second-degree rape, seven counts of forcible oral sodomy and five counts of bribery by a public official.


Burgess surrendered to Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation agents and was released from custody after posting $50,000 bail. He could not be reached for comment.

Among other things, Burgess is accused of having sex with a female drug court participant who was in his custody. The crimes allegedly occurred between October 2005 and April 2007.


A federal lawsuit filed in October claims Burgess told one drug court participant he would have her sent to prison if she didn’t comply with his sexual demands.

The lawsuit, filed by 12 former jail prisoners, alleges the sheriff’s employees had them engage in wet T-shirt contests and offered cigarettes to those who would flash their breasts.


One prisoner alleged she became a jail trusty with more freedom after agreeing to perform a sex act on Burgess, but lost that status when she later refused.

Burgess also faces two counts each of sexual battery, rape by instrumentation and subornation of perjury. Also filed were one count each of engaging in a pattern of criminal offenses, indecent exposure and kidnapping.


Special prosecutor James Boring said Burgess could be sentenced to 467 years in prison if convicted on all 35 counts.

Custer County Commissioner J.M. Kelly said the day-to-day operations of the sheriff’s department will be managed by undersheriff Kenneth Tidwell.

Kayden Kross Slams Vivid

Posted on by
Reply

Hey Vivid … one one of the world’s largest porn studios. Apparently you are cheap bastards who put the health and overall welfare of your stars in jeopardy. Well …. so says one of your former Vivid girls and no this time it isn’t Kira Kener.

I noticed that Kayden Kross had recently joined the writing staff over at MikeSouth.com and found her first post to be quite articulate and overall, a nice read. At first glance you would think her article was well written and that she might be one of the smarter porn stars in the business. I mean she can actually write big words and spell them correctly. And even more impressive she doesn’t use all caps. Colored me impressed to say the least. (No joking here, I actually really was impressed)

Kayden Kross

But then I thought for just a moment about what she was actually saying ,…. without calling them out by name, she just said that Vivid sucks and they were a crappy company to work for and cheap to boot. Not only that, but that their sets were horribly nasty and an extreme health risk.

Fourth/Fifth movie: with no script, no make up artist, and catered with McDonald’s, we managed a movie. Or two. I learned i had signed with the wrong company.


Sixth movie: i learned that porn stars need assistants (for…?). I finally walked through the perpetual enema juice on the bathroom floor without slipping, wincing, or gagging. This was a milestone.


If memory serves me correctly Kayden Kross did her first 6 or so movies with Vivid, most of which have yet to even be released yet. She went on to do one or two with Digital Playground and then signed with Adam and Eve. 

Interesting how she talks so much shit about Vivid. How they are cheap, unorganized, have low quality standards and health issues without specifically naming them. Did she really not think that people wouldn’t figure out she was bashing Vivid? I mean she’s only been in the business a year and prior to her contract with Adam and Eve she’s only had one other “contract”.

What the hell is this girl thinking? Did her momma never tell her that you don’t piss where you live? That if you poke the proverbial fire, that shit sparks back and just may burn you in the ass.



Her statements about her 6th movie basically back up what Kira Kener has been saying all along about working on the set of Vivid movies and may give Kira Kener’s psycho lawyers more ammunition to start more legal shit and from what i hear, she’s been trying to do already and now Kayden Kross has just confirmed that Vivid puts the girls on the set in an unsafe working environment and given Kira Kener’s lawyer an open invitation.



It will be interesting to say the least to see how this plays out.



I mean if nothing else, former Vivid girls publically calling out Vivid for being a cheap asses should be quite the show.

Network Solutions says Take it up the ass and like it boy

Posted on by
Reply

So it has recently come to light that anyone who has their domain names registered with Network Solutions might want to take a moment to seriously reconsider as to why. Let us start from the beginning so that you can fully understand the evil that is Network Solutions. Back in the day when we had no choice but to use Network Solutions they treated us like shit. They would “accidentally” double bill us, make mistakes with our accounts, let scammers fax in letters (without any other real proof that they are who they say they are) and take control of our domain name, because hey they faxed in a letter and who would lie via fax? I realize this was some 10 years ago but still, I’m sure many of those guys who had their domain names stolen because of Network Solutions total and complete incompetence are still pissed off an entire decade later, wouldn’t you be?


But all of that pales in comparison to their newest scam … and yes, I know scam is a harsh word but it is what it is. So here is how the scam works …. you think of a great domain name that you might want to register. You look it up using their WHOIS feature and they immediately “reserve” it. This prevents you from registering it with anyone but Network Solutions, of which they charge about 3 times more than the other registrars.


Nice, huh? Well that’s not all. Tech Crunch recently broke a new part of the story that makes it even more amazing that there isn’t some extremely huge class action law suit going on. Which to be honest, may very well already be under way. Sucks that I can’t get it on that one. Fuckers.


Anyway, once you register you nifty little domain name with Network Solutions, they will begin commandeering your unassigned sub-domains. For example FuckYou.LukeFord.com, KissMyASs.LukeFord.com, FuckYouFuckers.LukeFord.com. If you aren’t using them, they will!


They fill those pages with custom “parking” pages full of their own links so that if anyone happens to go to one of the sub domains they’ve hijacked, they are making money off all the links. There is no real way to tell how many of their customers they are fucking in the ass like this but it is estimated that they have done this to hundreds of thousands of sub domains, possibly millions.

MAN DOWN MAN DOWN!! Are you next?

Posted on by
1

And so the shit has hit the fan ….. well, almost. But if nothing else it can be the start of some very serious changes for the Internet and if you think this doesn’t effect you, you’re an idiot.

 

For many years we have enjoyed amazing freedoms with all that we do on the Internet. Almost all adult webmasters and pornographers shared the common thought that it couldn’t happen to them. And it’s true. For the most part, people left us alone. Unless a website had something like young girls, animals or simulated rape, we pretty much didn’t think anyone could touch us.

 

That couldn’t be further from the truth and John Stagliano found that out the hard way as he now faces up to 31 years of hard time and two of his companies each face a fine of up to $500,000.

 

I knew the name Evil Angel productions but I couldn’t think of any of their movies off the top of my head so I went digging and found some of their titles were Slutty & Sluttier 6, House of She-Males, Throat Fucks, Cock Pigs, My Evil Sluts, Anal Expedition, Teen Cum Squad, Rocco’s Obsession with Teen Supersluts, Ass Destroyers, Tamed Teens, Teens Corrupted and many, many more that just based on the title and box cover alone half the country would probably convict.

 

The movies named in the indictment are “Milk Nymphos” directed by Jay Sin, “Storm Squirters 2” directed by Joey Silvera and a trailer from Belladonna’s “Fetish Fanatic 5.”

Here are two box covers from adult movies. To the left we have a box cover from the Evil Angel movie called Gape Lovers 2 and to the right we have a Vivid movie starring Tia Bella called 2nd Coming. Just take a big guess which a jury might find obscene?

 

 

Evil Angel’s Gape Lovers 2 Tia Bella in 2nd Coming

 

 

For so many years we’ve gotten away with almost anything, we seem to have forgotten what we really could and couldn’t do without getting into trouble. We seem to think that’s it is perfectly fine to show a picture of one girl taking a piss on another girl , because for years nobody has gotten busted for it. That time has come and Evil Angel is the company taking the hit for it. Even more scary is the fact that one of the charges stems from his display of a movie trailer. A smart lawyer might later argue or relate this charge to those “free hosted galleries” so in reality, this opens up a whole can of worms that touches the lives of tens of thousands of people out there making their living peddling pussy, from the smallest site to the biggest.