About Scott Fayner

Former contributing editor at LukeFord.com.

DRUG FIEND TOM SIZEMORE ALLEGES SEX WITH A 19-YEAR-OLD PARIS HILTON

WWW.HOLLYWOOD.COM  – Troubled movie star Tom Sizemore claims he has bedded Paris Hilton when she was a teenager.

The Saving Private Ryan star, who has been in and out of court fighting drug and domestic abuse charges over the last two years, is the star of Vivid Entertainment’s new sex tape The Tom Sizemore Sex Scandal.

The video features the self-proclaimed sex addict having "inexhaustible sex" with up to four young women at a time. But, even more shocking is what the 44-year-old actor says about an alleged one-night stand with socialite Paris Hilton in 2001–when she was just 19.

He claims Hilton stayed behind after a party he threw and suggested quite explicitly that they have sex together. Sizemore alleges that the heiress showed him a very good time, adding, "She knew what she could do to people."

The actor recalls Hilton left "abruptly" in the morning, climbing into a long limousine with the parting words, "Goin’ to Sundance. See you next week."

During the candid interview on the sex tape, Sizemore also praises ex-fiancee Heidi Fleiss’ business sense and reveals the depths of despair and depression he went through during his recent legal proceedings.

The actor also claims he started taking crystal methamphetamine in a bid to relieve his depression. He also reveals he has a condition known as priapism, which causes an involuntary prolonged erection that allows him to perform intercourse for unusually long periods of time. 

Sizemore was recently ordered to attend an inpatient drug rehab clinic in Los Angeles, and yesterday he was handed probation for three years.

WHILE PARIS DENIES EVEN KNOWING SIZEMORE

WWW.HOLLYWOOD.COM In an interview on his new porn tape The Tom Sizemore Sex Scandal, the Saving Private Ryan star says he enjoyed a one-night stand with the then 19-year-old Hilton when she begged him for sex after a party. Sizemore goes on to allege hotel heiress Hilton showed him a good time, adding, "She knew what she could do to people."

But Hilton, now 24, is appalled by the suggestion she had sexual relations with the 44-year-old, who has been in and out of court fighting drug and domestic abuse charges over the last two years.

She tells Web site The Scoop, "It’s disappointing that Mr. Sizemore has to use my name to sell his DVDs. He is not an acquaintance of mine, nor have I ever had intimate relations with him."

EXTREME ASSOCIATES: PURVEYORS OF “THE MOST VILE AND DISGUSTING MATERIAL”?

HARDLY! IF ANYTHING, EXTREME IS A DISTANT SECOND TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT! 

FROM http://pittsburghlive.com/x/ People have a right to view obscene materials in their homes, but how those materials get there is at issue in a closely watched federal case that launched a renewed government crackdown, attorneys told a federal appeals panel Wednesday in Pittsburgh.

The government is asking the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate federal obscenity charges against a Los Angeles company, Extreme Associates, and its husband and wife owners, Robert Zicari and Janet Romano. U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster in January dismissed the 10-count indictment against the defendants.

"Morality is at the basis of all our laws," U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan told the three-judge panel. The government will continue to pursue regulating obscenity and its proliferation in order to protect children, unwitting adults, morality, public safety and societal order, she argued.

Attorneys for both sides agree the videos and movie clips purchased by an undercover postal inspector that led to the charges are obscene. The U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that people have the right to keep such material in their homes.

H. Louis Sirkin, a Cincinnati attorney representing Extreme Associates and its owners, argued the previous rulings must mean people have the right to receive the material.

"In order for me to exercise my right to have it, I have to get it," he said outside the courthouse. "One man’s garbage is another man’s beauty."

Extreme Associate’s members-only Web site allowed people to download video clips into their home computers and place orders online, he said.

Buchanan countered that the Supreme Court repeatedly has upheld federal obscenity statutes that prohibit interstate commerce of obscenity, including on the Internet.

Buchanan argued the judges should decide the case on the First Amendment’s privacy — not free speech — rights. Sirkin said the issue is substantive due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.

Sirkin told the Appeals Court he is not challenging federal obscenity laws in general or trying to get them overturned, but instead is arguing they do not apply in this case and his clients should not be subjected to criminal prosecution.

If convicted, Zicari and Romano — also known as Rob Black and Lizzie Borden — could face up to 50 years in prison and a $2.5 million fine. A judge could fine the company up to $5 million.

Yesterday, as attorneys argued the legalities of the case, Extreme Associates touted online the videos that led to the indictments as the "Federal Five."

The headline read: "These are the movies that the U.S. government is going to try to deem are OBSCENE."

The package, including "Lizzie Borden’s Forced Entry," "Cocktails 2," "Extreme Teens #24" and two titles not fit for a family newspaper, was being sold for $110. Individual titles were $44.95 each.

Buchanan said the case is being tried in Western Pennsylvania because the crimes occurred here. The undercover postal inspector worked here, and a local retailer and other people also bought videos from Extreme Associates, she said.

The company makes "the most vile and disgusting material that they could," Buchanan said after the hearing. The videos include graphic scenes of rape, murder, defecation and forcing women to drink human excrement, she said.

Buchanan spent nine of her 13 years as an assistant U.S. Attorney with the priority crime and violent offender division, primarily prosecuting child pornography cases. Those offenders often had obscenity as part of their child porn collections, she said.

"I started to see that this was a problem in Western Pennsylvania that needed to be addressed," she said.

The Justice Department has intensified its prosecution of obscenity cases in the past four years after ignoring such cases for nearly a decade, she said.

Fourteen organizations have joined both sides of the fight, filing friends of the court briefs to push their own arguments. Among those supporting the government are the National Law Center for Children & Families, Citizens for Community Values and The American Decency Association and Focus on the Family.

Among those siding with Extreme Associates are the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, the Free Speech Coalition and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

ANOTHER EXCITING EPISODE OF…

 

INTERNATIONAL EDITION!

TODAY’S COUNTRIES AND SOME PORNO FOLK WHO CALL THEM HOME

 

CLOCKWISE FROM TOP: MONICA SWEETHEART, LEA DE MAE, SYLVIA SAINT, DASHA, NIKITA DENISE AND JANA COVA

 

CLOCKWISE FROM TOP: SUNNY LEONE, SHAY SIGHTS, JUDY STARR, LAUREN PHOENIX, NIKKI BENZ AND LANNY BARBIE

 

CLOCKWISE FROM TOP: TAYLOR WANE, ROXY JEZEL, NICI STERLING, HANNAH HARPER, KAY PARKER AND FLICK SHAGWELL (CENTER)

 

STREET FIGHTING MAN

PORNO STUD/ASSKICKING MADMAN AARON BRINK AKA DICK DELAWARE TO BATTLE OCTOBER 29TH

Fayner Posts: Got word from Tyler Durden that the menace to society Aaron Brink will once again be entering the ring for an all-out brawl on October 29th in the Biggest Little City in the World, Reno, Nevada, at the King of the Cage held at the Silver Legacy.

FAYNER: Who are you fighting and how much money if you win?

BRINK: I’m fighting Richard Montoya for $12,500.

FAYNER: (lying) I know about that guy. He’s tough.

BRINK: Yeah?

FAYNER: No.

BRINK: It’s my first fight as a light-heavyweight.

FAYNER: (boldly) Smart move. You have been getting your ass beat as a heavyweight.

BRINK: Do you want to die?

FAYNER: No thank you. How has your quest to impregnate a Mexican chick been going?

BRINK: Still working on it. I did a scene recently with Madeline Marks and I tried to cum inside her, but it didn’t happen. I asked her afterwards if I could fuck her off-screen and blow one in her and she said yes, although it hasn’t happened yet.

FAYNER: Keep at it, okay? The odds are in your favor that one day you will get a Mexican gal pregnant.

BRINK: Thanks.

ANTI-SEX MILITANTS IN KANSAS SEEK 10% PORN TAX ARGUING “CONNECTION BETWEEN PORNOGRAPHY AND SEX CRIMES” COSTS THE STATE MONEY

BUT NO ONE HAS YET TO INFORM THEM THAT DIRECT LINK BETWEEN PORN AND CRIME HAS YET TO BE PROVED
www.kansas.com The battle over sexually explicit entertainment, already well under way in Wichita, appears headed for the state Capitol in the coming months.

Pornography opponents took their case Tuesday to a legislative panel, urging that lawmakers tax sales of explicit materials. The tax committee will decide next month whether to recommend a tax to the full Legislature, which convenes in January.

A lawyer representing three Wichita video stores, however, warned that the tax likely would not survive a legal challenge alleging violation of the constitutional right to free speech and equal protection under the law.

The 10 percent sales tax is being pushed as a grand jury in Wichita is examining whether porn shops violate the community’s obscenity standards.

And Wichita Mayor Carlos Mayans is promoting changes in zoning ordinances to force the shops to move elsewhere.

Rep. Shari Weber, a Herington Republican, said a tax is justified because of a connection between pornography and sex crimes. Those crimes cost the state money to investigate and prosecute offenders, keep them in prison, rehabilitate them and monitor them when they are discharged, she said.

"The state has a compelling interest to place an excise tax on these businesses because of their adverse effects on the health, well-being and safety of the citizens in our state," she said.

The Kansas Department of Revenue estimates that a 10 percent tax would generate $1 million a year.

That estimate, however, is based on a limited number of stores in the state that sell almost exclusively sex-related materials.

Phillip Cosby, an anti-porn activist from Abilene, said the tax should be levied on the materials wherever they are sold, not just those businesses that clearly identify themselves as adult shops.

In a visit to Concordia, he said, he found no stores specializing in sexually explicit material but five that sold some, he said.

"I would like the tax to follow the products, similar to a pack of cigarettes," he said.

John Ivan, a suburban Kansas City lawyer representing the three After Dark video stores in Wichita, said any porn tax that did not include all outlets, including the Internet and convenience stores, would run afoul of U.S. Supreme Court rulings in tax cases.

He also argued that numerous studies have failed to establish that viewing pornography leads to sex crimes.

 

ROUND TWO OF ROB BLACK OBSCENITY CASE BEGINS TODAY IN PITTSBURGH

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan BELIEVED TO STILL HAVE STICK UP HER BITTER ASS

http://www.post-gazette.com In a legal debate being watched nationwide, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan will face off today against a company that sells videos with brutal and graphic depictions of sexual violence.

Ms. Buchanan and H. Louis Sirkin, a Cincinnati lawyer who represents California-based Extreme Associates, will argue before a three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is hearing cases this week in Pittsburgh. The case represents the first major test of the obscenity laws in 15 years, and the federal government is on the defensive.

Ms. Buchanan’s office lost the first round in January when U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster threw out an indictment of Extreme and its owners, Robert Zicari, who calls himself "Rob Black," and his wife, Janet Romano, who uses the name "Lizzie Borden."

The judge ruled that federal obscenity statutes as applied by the prosecution violate protections of liberty and privacy.

The statutes say possession of obscene materials is legal, but distribution of them is not. So in essence, the judge said, the government ban on distribution of obscenity illegally infringes on people’s constitutional right to possess it.

The decision was a blow for the Justice Department and Ms. Buchanan, who brought the indictment in 2003 after an investigation by Los Angeles police and U.S. postal inspectors in Pittsburgh.

The case was part of a renewed crackdown by the government on extremely hard-core, violent pornography. The videos sold by the company show men gang-raping women, defecating and urinating on them, forcing them to drink bodily fluids and slitting their throats.

Ms. Buchanan said last week she couldn’t talk about the pending argument, one of the biggest in her career.

But in her legal briefs she said Judge Lancaster was wrong in how he interpreted two Supreme Court decisions, Stanley v. Georgia in 1969 and Lawrence v. Texas in 2003, to reach his conclusion.

In Stanley, the high court ruled that people could not be prosecuted for viewing obscenity in their homes. In Lawrence, the court ruled that two men could not be prosecuted for having sex in their home.

As he has done previously, Mr. Sirkin will rely on both cases in saying the government is improperly intruding on constitutional rights. He says people have the right to view porn videos in the privacy of their homes, but that right is infringed if they can’t get the films.

"If I can’t buy them, there really is no right," he said last year in squaring off with one of Ms. Buchanan’s assistants, Stephen Kaufman. "In order to be able to possess it, I need to be able to buy it."

Mr. Sirkin also says people’s sex lives are none of the government’s business.

Judge Lancaster largely agreed. He said the Stanley decision, in particular, means people have a corresponding right to distribute and receive obscene materials.

Ms. Buchanan said he’s wrong.

"The Supreme Court … has historically and repeatedly rejected the specious claim, and the flawed conclusion, that any right to privacy the court discussed in Stanley created some correlative right to receive or distribute obscene material," she wrote.

In looking at Lawrence, Judge Lancaster also sided with Mr. Sirkin in saying "the government can no longer rely on the advancement of a moral code, preventing consenting adults from entertaining lewd or lascivious thoughts, as a legitimate, let alone compelling, state interest."

Ms. Buchanan said the obscenity statutes don’t require the government to enter anyone’s house.

"An individual’s interest in the privacy of his home is not implicated … by a prohibition on the shipment or distribution of obscenity because such prohibition does not require the government to invade the sanctity of the home," she wrote. "It is not personal intimate relations, but the commercial distribution of obscenity, that is at issue here."

Advocates on both sides of the debate have filed friend-of-the-court briefs in the case, although the papers weren’t available yesterday.

Those arguing before the 3rd Circuit normally have 15 minutes each. But in this case, Ms. Buchanan and Mr. Sirkin have each been granted 25 minutes.

The judges won’t rule from the bench but will write an opinion at a later date.

 

LYNN LYNN THE QUEEN OF SIN

The Wide World of Gina Lynn

Van Nuys, CA October 18th, 2005 Gina Lynn, adult film star, exotic dancer, and owner of her production company, Gina Lynn Productions, is keeping an extra busy schedule this fall, as she hits the road, all the way through The AVN Expo in January.

Gina recently picked up the award for Best New Production Company as chosen by the fans at the Night Moves Awards in Tampa. “ I want to thank everyone who voted. This is an amazing award. A big thank you to Paul and Tracy Allen, they are so good to me.”

Gina Lynn will be in Berlin for the Venus Show, promoting her new DVD with Club, entitled Flash, the first of a new series starring the Club contract performer. In FLASH, Gina plays a sexy photographer who drops her inhibitions when she picks up a camera and brings her fantasy photo shoots to life. This highly stylized production co-stars Brittney Skye, Lexie Marie, Harmony, Brooke and Shy Love with Travis Knight, Lee Stone and more.

The Gina Lynn Collection, made exclusively by California Exotic Novelties, has had a banner year in sales, thanks to the endless promotional and marketing efforts of California Exotics, and Gina Lynn. The Gina Lynn Collection consists of 32 separate and distinct signature products, which include Futurotic Vibes, Vibrating Pleasure Probes, and Futurotic Vibro Eggs and Rings, not to mention a genuine cast of her vagina, and Gina’s Bondage Gear – including the Pleasure Play Pleasure Swing.

Gina Lynn Productions has just released Top Notch Bitches 3, Double Dutch, and Filthy Ho’s 3. All are distributed by Exquisite Multimedia, Inc. Check out these titles and more at www.expxxx.com and click on Gina Lynn.

Gina Lynn recently discussed her new endeavors and busy schedule with the G4 TV Network and The Man Show. You can read at the article at the following address: http://www.g4tv.com/themanshow/features/52693/Gina_Lynn_Talks_The_Man_Show.html 

The following is Gina Lynn’s tour schedule for 2005

  • Oct. 18th-24th
  • Berlin, Germany for The Venus show w/Club
  • Nov. 1st-5th
  • Feature Dancing in Little Rock, Ark. @ Paper Moon
  • Nov. 10th-12th
  • Feature Dancing in Long Island City, NY @ Riviera
  • Nov. 17th-19th
  • Feature Dancing in St. Louise, Mo @ Hustler Club
  • Dec. 8th-11th
  • Feature Dancing in Mission, TX @ Pleasure Mission
  • Dec. 14th-17th
  • Feature Dancing in Reading, Pa @ Al’s Diamond Cabaret

Born in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico to Puerto Rican and Italian parents, Gina Lynn made her naked debut at an amateur night at Al’s Diamond Cabaret. From her first-ever layout for Cheri magazine in 1997, to her mainstream role in the film Analyze That, Gina Lynn has made waves throughout the adult and mainstream industries. Gina’s mainstream appeal skyrocketed when she answered a casting call to be a “Bada Bing” girl on the HBO smash “The Sopranos” and as a stripper on the hit NBC show, “Third Watch.” Hip hop giant Eminem personally chose Gina as the main girl in his video for the chart-topper (and included on the DVD for his runaway hit 8 Mile), “Super Man,” which was a huge story in the mainstream world and covered by such outlets like “Entertainment Tonight.” Gina currently has a distribution deal through Exquisite for her company, Gina Lynn Productions, which kicked things off with her ongoing series, Top Notch Bitches. Gina has also signed a contract with Club magazine and their video division. At the 2005 AVN Awards, Gina won gonzo DVD of the year for Gina Lynn’s Darkside, which was released through Jules Jordan Video for Evil Angel prior to her Club contract.

For more on Gina, go to http://www.ginalynn.com

For interviews, artwork, and more info, please contact Brian Gross, BSG PR, (818) 343-3673. email: brian@bsgpr.com  or briansgross@gmail.com .

IT’S OFFICIAL: WOMEN IN PORN ARE CAPABLE OF MORE THAN JUST BEING A RECEPTACLE FOR SEMEN!

 

  

The Official Launch Party for Naked Ambition @ NACIONAL is OCTOBER 20TH

An Anthology of writings from Women who are changing the Adult Industry, Performers, Directors, Journalists & Publicists, including Theresa Flynt, Tera Patrick, Stormy Daniels, Holly Randall, Nina Hartley, Joy King, Shane, Violet Blue and Danni Ashe to name just a few of the 31.

This Party marks the launch of a huge Book tour of Readings & parties including a Reading by several Contributors at The Hustler Hollywood Store before the party, a huge party in Chicago during Pimp & Ho Halloween, & Virgin Mega Store Reading & After Party in New York

 email brad@intoxicateu.com for more information
 

ABOUT Naked Ambition

When porn first appeared on the pop culture radar, it surfaced as an underground phenomenon that took over movie theatres in red light districts across the globe. Titles like "Deep Throat," "Behind The Green Door," "Misty Beethoven" and "Insatiable" became household names, as did women like Linda Lovelace and Marilyn Chambers. The 80s brought the home video revolution, and – constantly adapting to new technologies – porn went right along with it, launching a number of powerhouse video companies that furnished the world with smut they could view in the comfort of their own home. This was also when toy companies as we know them today truly started appearing on the map, bringing "sexual aides"

to the masses. And then there were the 90s, which brought along the Internet revolution, another charge led by the adult industry as companies and stars alike flocked to the World Wide Web, some becoming multi-millionaires almost overnight. Soon after the writers followed, bringing forth a batch of sex positive females whose mandate was to make sexuality and pornography comfortable for the everyman. And while the history of the adult industry’s steady climb into meteoric popularity is certainly interesting, it’s the women behind it that make it more interesting.

In the beginning, women were little more than the eye candy that helped drive the eyeballs to a product – you saw them in adult magazines, on box covers and naked on your TV screen, and for the most part they answered to men. But as porn evolved with the times in terms of technology and consumer demand, it also adapted more sexual equality both in front of and behind the cameras. Not only are the female performers taking charge of their careers, but women are running the companies people purchase movies from, opening stores that porn purveyors patronize, and writing thoughtful, analytical commentary on America’s most favorite pastime since baseball. And this generation of women in and around the adult industry is helping shape and change society’s views on sexuality.

For well over a decade now, women sex writers and pornographers have brought strong women to pornography and pornography to strong women, changing the ways we look at both pornography and women’s thoughts on it. Women such as Susie Bright and Annie Sprinkle helped open the adult film field to other women, including women viewers, allowing for a new interpretation of what’s erotic and what’s taboo. This first wave of women pornographers lead to a cultural revolution in the 1990s, when younger women took inspiration from the sex pioneers of the 1970s and 80s thereby setting off a new wave of women pornographers that reaches all the way up to today.

No book before has charted the evolution of this body of work, much less in the voices of those women responsible for it. Thus, Naked Ambition charts this course by inviting 31 of the leading women involved in adult entertainment and the proliferation of it to share their ideas, experiences, histories, and passions so that we might better understand the profound influence that porn – a social force that feminists and others on the left for a generation espoused as dangerous and degrading to women – had in helping liberate a newer, younger generation of women into claiming their sexual selves on their own terms.