July 9, 2025

3 thoughts on “John Holmes the porn legend or the child rapist? You decide.

  1. The following does not condone having sex with a person under the age of 18, but I bristled at the description of a 16-year-old as a “child.” A prepubescent is what I think of with the word “child.” When teens (that would have been the better term to use in this case) in particularly the grayline years of 16-17 (whose maturity level is not that far off from the legal age of 18; we all know how we were at age 16, and it wasn’t as though we were far more immature than we would be two years later) are referred to as children, I think of moralists with hang-ups who make the determination that teen-agers aren’t ready to have sex, because the overriding societal message is that sex is wrong. Yet certainly many in this age group, and even younger, do have sex, legally, with those of their own age group. With the media bombardment of sexual messages (the greater the sexual repression in a free society, the greater the messages of sex), younger children and teen-agers have become far more sophisticated, sexually, than their counterparts from previous generations. So then it becomes even weirder to think of a 16-year-old as an innocent child.

  2. jukebox, Dawn was 15 and John was 32. This was also in 1976. The media you’re talking about wasn’t around back then. So she was much more innocent then compared to many today. Her father also left Dawn with John as he had become a father figure to her.

Leave a Reply