<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: XCritic Bitch Slaps Digital Playground	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lukeford.com/2011-08-24/xcritic-bitch-slaps-digital-playground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lukeford.com/2011-08-24/xcritic-bitch-slaps-digital-playground/</link>
	<description>Your #1 source for Adult Industry News and Porn Star Gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gossip Girl		</title>
		<link>https://lukeford.com/2011-08-24/xcritic-bitch-slaps-digital-playground/comment-page-1/#comment-1724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gossip Girl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=21994#comment-1724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t write movie reviews so your attempted insult to me about that doesn&#039;t really apply.  As far a credibility goes, if you really want to worry about that, you might want to consider asking your reviewers to write about the quality of the movie, not obsess about their own body image issues.

As far as the jaded issue, I was more referring to you than her.  But I suspect you knew that all along.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t write movie reviews so your attempted insult to me about that doesn&#8217;t really apply.  As far a credibility goes, if you really want to worry about that, you might want to consider asking your reviewers to write about the quality of the movie, not obsess about their own body image issues.</p>
<p>As far as the jaded issue, I was more referring to you than her.  But I suspect you knew that all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Houstondon		</title>
		<link>https://lukeford.com/2011-08-24/xcritic-bitch-slaps-digital-playground/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Houstondon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=21994#comment-1723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rather than take a few words out of context as a company apologist might do, wouldn&#039;t it make more sense to read the entire review? I wonder if you even bothered since Riley Steele wasn&#039;t even in the flick that MH reviewed (and contrary to the comments, he hasn&#039;t reviewed enough titles to be jaded).

Your article further suggests reviewers need to sugarcoat what they think of a movie in order to gain advertising dollars.  While this may be the standard model for your works, doesn&#039;t that weaken any hope of credibility one might have with consumers?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than take a few words out of context as a company apologist might do, wouldn&#8217;t it make more sense to read the entire review? I wonder if you even bothered since Riley Steele wasn&#8217;t even in the flick that MH reviewed (and contrary to the comments, he hasn&#8217;t reviewed enough titles to be jaded).</p>
<p>Your article further suggests reviewers need to sugarcoat what they think of a movie in order to gain advertising dollars.  While this may be the standard model for your works, doesn&#8217;t that weaken any hope of credibility one might have with consumers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
