<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Luke Ford &#187; Mike South</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lukeford.com/adult_news/mike-south/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lukeford.com</link>
	<description>Luke Ford is your #1 source for Adult Industry News and Porn Star Gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We can&#8217;t be right all the time, right Mike?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-12/we-cant-be-right-all-the-time-right-mike/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-12/we-cant-be-right-all-the-time-right-mike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gossip Girl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Playground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=24274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South posted a story on his site the other day which claims Manwin owned DP as long ago as September 2010 stating DCMA information as evidence but that actually isn&#8217;t the case at all.  He forgets that long before Manwin bought DP, they took over running their websites and that is why you see ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike South posted a story on his site the other day which claims Manwin owned DP as long ago as September 2010 stating DCMA information as evidence but that actually isn&#8217;t the case at all.  He forgets that long before Manwin bought DP, they took over running their websites and that is why you see Manwin related texts dating back to September 2010 in association with Digital Playground.  [<a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/digital-playground/digital-playground-owned-by-manwin-as-far-back-as-sep-2010-6082/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
<div>
<h1>Digital Playground Owned By Manwin As Far Back As Sep 2010</h1>
</div>
<div>By <strong>MikeSouth</strong> &#8211; May 10th, 2012</div>
<p>Look at this dmca notice I found, note the dates:  Fabian claimed he never had anything to do with DP until Dec of 11  Totally not true&#8230;</p>
<h1>Declaration of Assignment of Copyright Protection Agent</h1>
<hr />
<h2>Degban</h2>
<h1>A Multimedia Copyright Protection Company</h1>
<p>Hereby I Fabian Thylmann on behalf of Froytal Services Ltd. the main copyright holder for the contents produced under the following brand titles:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.digitalplayground.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalplayground.com/</a></li>
</ul>
<p>distributed via&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.The respective Websites via the designated member area&#8230;open to age verified paying customers &#8230;&#8230;declare Degban Ltd as the Copyright Protection Agent to protect contents produced under the brands..Indicated above. by.Froytal Services Ltd.<br />
This assignment gives Degban Ltd. the power and permission to execute legally permissible actions against any person or entity that is:</p>
<ul>
<li>Infringing the copyrights in regards to aforementioned brand.</li>
<li>Is assisting in infringement of copyright in regards to aforementioned brand.</li>
<li>Misusing the brand or products of aforementioned brand and copyright holders generally or in regards to the terms of service and sale.</li>
</ul>
<p>These actions include but are not limited to contacting concerned legal bodies or private and public entities involved and concerned. This assignment allows Degban Ltd. to communicate such concerns with involved or suspected persons or entities. This assignment is valid parallel to the validity of the contract between Degban Ltd and &#8230; Froytal Services Ltd. This assignment does not grant right or shift the responsibility of seeking judgment against suspected persons by Degban Ltd. from a court of law.</p>
<p>Signature of Copyright holder or authorized representative:<br />
Name: &#8230;. Fabian Thylmann&#8230;..<br />
Company: &#8230;&#8230;. Froytal Services Ltd&#8230;.<br />
Address:<br />
c/o Webexpansions Cyprus Ltd<br />
Kermia Building<br />
4 Diagorou Street, Office 204<br />
Nicosia, Cyprus 1097<br />
Telephone: +35722662320<br />
Website: www.manwin.com<br />
Email: fabian@manwin.com<br />
DATE: 24/September/2010</p>
<div>Suite 12412, Second Floor, 145-157 St John Street, London EC1V 4PY United Kingdom</div>
<div>Phone: +44 02031298795</div>
<div>Fax : +44 02033573100</div>
<div>www.Degban.com</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-12/we-cant-be-right-all-the-time-right-mike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Big Of A Deal Is The Condom Ordinance Really?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-04/how-big-of-a-deal-is-the-condom-ordinance-really/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-04/how-big-of-a-deal-is-the-condom-ordinance-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gossip Girl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked Pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=24219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South had a very interesting article today on his site that I wanted to share with all of you.  [source] How Big Of A Deal Is The Condom Ordinance Really As I look through the current AVN Magazine I notice that of the top 50 sales and rentals one company dominates.  Wicked Pictures. Wicked ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike South had a very interesting article today on his site that I wanted to share with all of you.  [<a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/reader-mail/how-big-of-a-deal-is-the-condom-ordinance-really-6061/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
<div>
<h2>How Big Of A Deal Is The Condom Ordinance Really</h2>
</div>
<p>As I look through the current AVN Magazine I notice that of the top 50 sales and rentals one company dominates.  Wicked Pictures.</p>
<p>Wicked even had the number one selling and renting title in the country and it&#8217;s an all condom company.  This leads me to think that at least at the high end, the whole condom thing isn&#8217;t even an issue in terms of revenues.  I can see where it might effect sales of the basic all sex videos but those are getting hit hard anyway. one guy even wrote to me and in his email he stated that he was a long time fan of porn but that the proliferation of violence and &#8220;consensual&#8221; rape scenes had more of an effect on his quitting porn than condoms would have.</p>
<p>I hear that a lot actually, even today theres a thread on GFY about it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr Peabody Writes:</p>
<p>Living a life of a pornmeister I, like most of you, &#8220;get to&#8221; (oh joy) watch seemingly endless hours of raw, nasty fucking. WooHoo! Except&#8230;.well, I see some of the same shit over and over again that I CANNOT STAND TO LOOK AT ANYMORE so was just wondering if others felt the same way about some of these:</p>
<p>* <strong>Bald guys fucking</strong>. i do NOT want to watch some Nazi skinhead gym/roid fag pound some girl as she pretends to just &#8220;love it&#8221;.</p>
<p>* <strong>Cumshots on the face</strong>. I know, how can someone complain about &#8220;the money shot&#8221;? Well, the girl usually jumps off the stunt dick so quick to &#8220;get in position&#8221; that it looks fucking ridiculous. Besides, some of these dudes need to jack it forever just to cum, after endlessly fucking like a machine. So isn&#8217;t he just masturbatingon a chick? Ridiculous.</p>
<p>* <strong>Green couch sex</strong>. (Okay, ANY &#8220;bright colored&#8221; couch). The scene starts, we see a damn UGLY green couch, and boring mechanical sex. PLEASE get some new sets.</p>
<p>* <strong>Slapping, punching, choking, violent sex</strong>. I consider these scenes, where the guy is basically abusing the girl, &#8216;consensual rape scenes&#8217; and I find them disgusting. Most &#8216;adult performers&#8217; need to get angry (and/or drugged up) just to do these kins of scenes and, again, they make me sick.</p>
<p>* <strong>Let&#8217;s see how many dicks we can fuck</strong>. Line &#8216;em up, fuck the shit out of a girl&#8230;again, looks like consensual gang rape to me. And all those guys, dicks out, waiting to be serviced is totally gay to me.</p>
<p>* <strong>DP &#8211; c&#8217;mon people</strong>. This is &#8216;freak sex&#8217;. Let&#8217;s see how many cocks (or objects) we can stuff inside some holes. Gross. And guys: you basically have another dude&#8217;s cock right next to yours or some dude laying on top of you. Gay.</p>
<p>* <strong>European anal sex</strong>. It&#8217;s so common it&#8217;s uninteresting. The same European/Russian girls moaning robotically as they take a giant cock up their poopster. These girls don&#8217;t even know they&#8217;re being fucked half the time as their minds just &#8216;check out&#8217; (Czech out? hehe) and I find the sex boring as fuck.</p>
<p>* <strong>Facial abuse</strong>. When i get a blowjob I want to feel it, enjoy it &#8211; not ram my cock down some poor girl&#8217;s mouth til she cries, gags, bleeds and God knows what else. Again, consensual rape and it&#8217;s disgusting.</p>
<p>* <strong>Casting couch scenes</strong>. Either there&#8217;s an endless supply of gullible dumb-ass whores out there (okay, probably) or people can be entertained by the same repetive shit forever. Watching the same boring &#8220;audition sex&#8221; on a fucking black leather couch, over and over again, is amazingly boring.</p>
<p>* <strong>Girls waving good-bye after a scene</strong>. Okay, we&#8217;ve just used and abused you as a sperm dumpster for twenty minutes, every hole is stretched out and you probably want be able to walk for a couple days, and there&#8217;s a gallon of cum dripping down your face, and you were just hit, choked, gagged and called a &#8216;fucking worthless whore&#8217;, so smile and wave to the camera! Hi Dad!</p></blockquote>
<p>Out of 45 responses to the thread only 4 disagreed with an part of it. the consensus being that porn, from a fans perspective, has just gotten too formulaic, too acted, and has no connection to reality.</p>
<p>As one fan put it: &#8220;yes porn is about fantasy, but it has to be a part of that fantasy that I feel like a guy like me has a shot at that girl.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2012-05-04/how-big-of-a-deal-is-the-condom-ordinance-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Call to Unite the Industry Against .XXX</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2012-02-10/a-call-to-unite-the-inudstry-against-xxx/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2012-02-10/a-call-to-unite-the-inudstry-against-xxx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Ford XXX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.XXX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICM Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=23721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South is calling out the industry and saying Lets Get Together On .XXX [source] There has been some issues regarding XBiz and support of .xxx on their part and maybe they helped and maybe they didn&#8217;t and ASACP was all for it and now they are all against it and so on. XBiz has ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<h2>Mike South is calling out the industry and saying Lets Get Together On .XXX</h2>
</div>
<p>[<a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/lets-get-together-on-xxx-5801/" target="_blank">source</a>] There has been some issues regarding XBiz and support of .xxx on their part and maybe they helped and maybe they didn&#8217;t and ASACP was all for it and now they are all against it and so on.</p>
<p>XBiz has asked me to be either a speaker or on a panel at the XBiz Summit in Miami and I am inclined to accept, whatever the past is XBiz is clearly no longer supporting .xxx.  They refuse to take ads from them as do I. If XBiz and I can help to educate and make positive changes in this industry I welcome that opportunity.</p>
<p>My proposal is that we all step it up, we never wanted .XXX and we can rid our industry of this scourge. here are some ideas that hopefully we can all agree to implement.  I agree to do so.</p>
<ol>
<li>Do not buy any .XXX domains and don&#8217;t pay to reserve them. .XXX is already falling rapidly in terms of use, most of the registrations were defensive, but remember Stuart Lawley makes a lot of money on those defensive registrations.</li>
<li>Do not accept any advertising for anything .xxx, this includes websites, domain registrars etc</li>
<li>If you are an adult site, do not allow any affiliates to use a .xxx domain (Manwin has implemented this one already, as have I.) Doing so immediately closes your account and forfeits any money you may have coming.</li>
<li>Do not run a press release or any positive article about .xxx or anyone affiliated with .xxx.  Sorry Stormy Daniels and Nina Mercedez you sold us out, if you fuck up I will gladly point it out, If you win an academy award for your latest movie, my readers won&#8217;t read about it. Same for you Shafta and your stupid fucking awards.</li>
<li>Your company will terminate any business relationship with anyone be paid to support .xxx.  In other words Nina and Stormy you are dead to us.</li>
<li>If you are a fan and you support this industry, don&#8217;t patronize any .xxx site ever.</li>
</ol>
<p>Plain and simple, for once lets all stand together and rid ourselves of a scourge on our industry.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Here at LukeFord.com we join the cause and say &#8230;&#8230;</h2>
<ul>
<li>We will not buy a .XXX domain name.</li>
<li>We will not accept any advertising from any .XXX websites.</li>
<li>We will not run press releases for any .XXX website.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2012-02-10/a-call-to-unite-the-inudstry-against-xxx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AVN Award Bitterness</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-12-09/avn-award-bitterness/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-12-09/avn-award-bitterness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Ford XXX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVN Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=22954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t understand some people.  When the AVN award nominations were announced there were a flood of messages from porn stars thanking AVN for the recognition.  Then there was a few messages from a producer with obvious tones of bitterness. He&#8217;s been directing lower budget gonzo movies for a particular studio for about 6 years ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand some people.  When the AVN award nominations were announced there were a flood of messages from porn stars thanking AVN for the recognition.  Then there was a few messages from a producer with obvious tones of bitterness.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been directing lower budget gonzo movies for a particular studio for about 6 years now.  While it is true he has over 200 directorial credits to his name, this is porn and that isn&#8217;t really saying much.    They are all for the same low budget type movies such as Fuck My Big Gaping Ass Hole volume 316.  Beyond that he hasn&#8217;t really contributed that much to the betterment of the industry.   Yet he felt slighted for not being inducted into the AVN Hall of Fame this year.  I can see if maybe he had directed some big budget features or did something, anything that contributed to the betterment of the industry but he hadn&#8217;t.  So yes, it annoyed me a lot about this guy and how some people have such a feeling of entitlement in this business.</p>
<p>Later that day my attention was drawn to a tweet by another person with the scent of bitterness.  She was complaining how her &#8220;fans&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t get the joy of seeing her at the AVN show this year in Vegas because nobody had bothered to hire her for the entire year last year.  She would ramble on a bit about how she is sorry to for her fans that wouldn&#8217;t get to see her at the awards show this year but maybe next year.  I&#8217;m sorry but if you can&#8217;t get a single booking in an entire year, you might perhaps want to seriously consider a career change.  Obviously this business isn&#8217;t for you.</p>
<p>Then today we had <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/some-thoughts-on-porn-awards-pornwikileaks-and-memory-5613/" target="_blank">the post</a> by Mike South who felt slighted for his lack of award nominations or to be blunt, because AVN didn&#8217;t see fit to induct him into the AVN Hall of Fame.  While it is true Mike South&#8217;s efforts in getting PWL taken down were an important contribution to the betterment of the industry &#8230;.. is that ONE effort, really worth a Hall of Fame entry?</p>
<p>I mean come on.  What else have you done?  IAFD shows he has less than 30 directorial credits to his name.  That&#8217;s not exactly ground breaking.  I think the little fuck who used to get me coffee has more than that now with his first month in the business.</p>
<p>So he&#8217;s been around a long time.  This is true.  About 17 years.  But in that time what has he specifically done for the betterment of the industry or that was so ground breaking?  He posts on a blog and often refers to other blogs as &#8220;lessor&#8221; despite the fact that the 4 he calls that have 2 and 3 times more traffic than his own.</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t live in porn valley or ever attend any porn related events.  At least not that I&#8217;ve heard of.  I read his blog quite often and over the years have yet to see any actual talk of him doing anything for the industry other than his rants on a blog.  While that&#8217;s all well and good, how does that actually entitle him to an induction in the AVN Hall of Fame?</p>
<p>He can lay claim to managing Kayden Kross.  That is something but then again about 900 suitcase pimps that are currently active in the business use that same argument to justify their own existence.</p>
<p>So not to be a dick, but really what the fuck makes you people think you are so God damn special that YOU deserve to be in the hall of fame?</p>
<p>Not just Mike South, who out of the three people I spoke about at least can say he picked a fight with Donny Long and got the fucking stupid site taken down.  But seriously people, why do you think so fucking highly of yourself?  GET OVER IT.   YOU AREN&#8217;T THAT FUCKING SPECIAL.</p>
<p>You made a few low budget fuck flicks.  That doesn&#8217;t make you worthy of a hall of fame induction.  It just means you did the exact same thing 4,000 other guys did.  You aren&#8217;t special for it.</p>
<p>So let me tell you all a little secret.</p>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">GET THE FUCK OVER YOURSELF.</h1>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">YOU AREN&#8217;T HALF AS GREAT AS YOU SEEM TO THINK YOU ARE.</h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>No seriously.  You really aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-12-09/avn-award-bitterness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something in their air in blogdom?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-10-12/something-in-their-air-in-blogdom/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-10-12/something-in-their-air-in-blogdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gossip Girl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke is Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=22378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s going on in pornville lately with industry blogs?  Some haven&#8217;t had updates in months, others are having a lot of technical issues.  Case in point, if you head over to our friends at Lukeisback, you notice their site has been up and down a lot this past month.  In fact, for the last 48 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s going on in pornville lately with industry blogs?  Some haven&#8217;t had updates in months, others are having a lot of technical issues.  Case in point, if you head over to our friends at Lukeisback, you notice their site has been up and down a lot this past month.  In fact, for the last 48 hours you can&#8217;t get to it at all.  Cindi forwarded the domain name to one of her other sites and posted this message to her fans &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If you’ve been having problems seeing or logging on to <a href="http://lukeisback.com/" target="_blank">Lukeisback.com</a>, it’s because I am having server issues, with just about no help, but lots of expense from my sucky hosting company VERIO!  My advice is don’t use them for anything!  Ladieznight.com is on a different carrier, so there are no problems here. Please check this out and enjoy!  LIB should be back up for good tomorrow afternoon and you’ll be able to post comments again. There may still be some issues with the last few days stories, but I’ll try to get them back up right away.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>But Cindi isn&#8217;t the only one with problems.  Been to Mike South&#8217;s site lately?  If you do you might find your virus checker going mad.  Turns out he&#8217;s the victim of a page injection hack and those with standard settings on their browser can&#8217;t reach the site at all.  Instead what they get is a warning message to turn around and run the other way.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//mike-south-hacked.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-22379" title="mike-south-hacked" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//mike-south-hacked-600x305.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="244" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Think we all need some boobie time!  So enjoy this picture of some Devon boobies because well &#8230; <strong><a title="Porn Star Devon" href="http://www.deardevon.com" target=_blank>Devon</a></strong> always seems to put a smile on my face so maybe she will do the same for you.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//74-Copy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-22382" title="Porn Star Devon" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//74-Copy-600x384.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="384" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-10-12/something-in-their-air-in-blogdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the Bibi Jones Bullshit</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-06-14/more-on-the-bibi-jones-bullshit/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-06-14/more-on-the-bibi-jones-bullshit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gossip Girl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adult Cybermart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adult FYI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibi Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Playground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Jane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=19975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult Cybermart ran a story today about Bibi Jones quoting this person who still claims he isn&#8217;t BiBi Jones using a fake name.  Now you may recall that previous he claimed to be a business professional, marketing guru and legal expert.  Well now apparently he is a webmaster as well and claims that a few ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.adultcybermart.com/Home.html" target="_blank">Adult Cybermart </a>ran a story today about <em><a href="http://lukeford.com/2011-06-09/did-bibi-jones-just-cost-dp-some/" target="_blank">Bibi Jones quoting this person who still claims he isn&#8217;t BiBi Jones using a fake name</a></em>.  Now you may recall that previous he claimed to be a business professional, marketing guru and legal expert.  Well now apparently he is a webmaster as well and claims that a few thousands members would line up to pay money for her website and that she would be making $60,000 to $70,000 a month.</p>
<p>No seriously.  He really said that.</p>
<blockquote>
<h2><strong>&#8220;If she   attracted a few thousand members who&#8217;d pay $19.95 a month,  that sounds like $60K   or $70K a month? Basically that&#8217;s the deal. I  don&#8217;t see how she loses either   way.</strong><strong> &#8220;I&#8217;m not some retard falling off the bus,&#8221; MFOB assures me. </strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> &#8220;But I&#8217;m here to protect her interests. You can be sure any bullies,  any   swine, any hustlers, anything that tries to get in her way will be  met with   attack.&#8221;</strong></h2>
</blockquote>
<p>Every time this guy opens his mouth he shows how little he really knows about the business.  If she could really make $60k to $70k a month then by all means she needs to get on it.  However as I have 15 years experience in that specific thing and I can tell you, she won&#8217;t make more than $2,000.  I&#8217;ve seen her numbers she just doesn&#8217;t have that many fans.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19976" title="BiBiJonesFinal" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//BiBiJonesFinal.png" alt="" width="421" height="557" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">As far as Jesse Jane goes, the story on <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/jesse-jane/jesse-jane-and-bibi-jones-an-insiders-perspective-5107/" target="_blank">Mike South</a> today pretty much says it best &#8230;</p>
<p>Jesse Jane: One of the few proven commodities in Porn.  Name anyone  who’s been as consistent both on camera and off as Jesse. On camera,   she’s pretty much followed the dream scenario of a successful porn career. Always  leave them wanting more. Off,  She’s one of the most liked performers by the media,  always positive, no attitude,  A total pro.  The  Perfect face for Digital Playground.</p>
<p>Of course the best part of that story on Mike South was about Bibi Jones.  &#8220;<strong><em>Is this the new age Digital Playground contract star? Pick up random  untested  strangers, have un protected Sex anywhere, anytime, go back to  work, spread the  love?</em></strong>&#8220;</p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-06-14/more-on-the-bibi-jones-bullshit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New FSC Talent Testing Prices Leaked</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-27/new-fsc-talent-testing-prices-leaked/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-27/new-fsc-talent-testing-prices-leaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=19799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If what Mike South is saying is true, the newly formed FSC testing center will be significantly more expensive.  Here is what he says &#8230;&#8230; Prices for FSC Testing Leaked By MikeSouth &#8211; From an insider Mike, The pricing has been set for the FSC APHSS it will be as follows: $150 per test $50 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>If what Mike South is saying is true, the newly formed FSC testing center will be significantly more expensive.  Here is what he says &#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p><a title="Permanent Link to Prices for FSC Testing Leaked" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.mikesouth.com/free-speech-coalition/prices-for-fsc-testing-leaked-5067/" target="_blank">Prices for FSC Testing Leaked</a> By <strong>MikeSouth</strong> &#8211; From an insider</p>
</div>
<blockquote><p>Mike,</p>
<p>The pricing has been set for the FSC APHSS it will be as follows:</p>
<p>$150 per test</p>
<p>$50 a year per performer</p>
<p>$250 a month per producer</p></blockquote>
<p>150 a test?  SERIOUSLY?  Theres a fail for you.</p>
<p>50.00 a year dues for performers and 250.00 for producers?  What have you done to even consider asking for this money?</p>
<p>Talent testing is way cheaper for the same tests with the same  database, why would anyone pay more and have to join a union to do it?</p>
<p>Who is dreaming up this cock-a-maimy stuff?</p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-27/new-fsc-talent-testing-prices-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Red Scare is Among Us Thanks to PornWikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-20/the-red-scare-is-among-us-thanks-to-pornwikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-20/the-red-scare-is-among-us-thanks-to-pornwikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gossip Girl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adult FYI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donny Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monica Foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porn Wiki Leaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=19750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Mike South said he had intel of more names of people involved in the porn wikileaks site.  This time he named Jack Vegas, Donny Long, Keith O&#8217;Conner, and Joe LiBrandi.  While he didn&#8217;t provide any proof, nor hint at who his sources were or even if they had any proof, he named names anyway. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Mike South <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/jack-vegas-leaking-info-to-donny-long-5044/" target="_blank">said he had intel</a> of more names of people involved in the porn wikileaks site.  This time he named Jack Vegas, Donny Long, Keith O&#8217;Conner, and Joe LiBrandi.  While he didn&#8217;t provide any proof, nor hint at who his sources were or even if they had any proof, he named names anyway.</p>
<h2>This is like the good ole days of the RED SCARE.  Name your enemies before they name you.  Proof of validity of your statements be damned!</h2>
<blockquote><p><em>I have it from an impeccable source that Jack Vegas is one of the guys  leaking info to Donny Long.  I have heard other names as well but this  one is checking out.  Might at the very least wanna have him explain  before you hire him again.  I&#8217;m also getting good intel that Keith  O&#8217;Conner, former owner of ScottFayner.com is involved in PWL along with  Joseph LiBrandi and Donald Carlos Seoane</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The same day <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/keith-oconnor-says-not-me-5046/" target="_blank">Keith O&#8217;Connor responded to Mike South</a> with an interesting twist, he basically said that now that he is aware of the site he doesn&#8217;t like it and he would be willing to put his money where his mouth is and pay the person who reveals the real people behind the site a $5,000 bounty.</p>
<p>So here is your chance to cash in with $5,000 bucks.  Just reveal who is really behind PWL and you get the money.</p>
<p>Earlier today Jack Vegas responded, this time speaking with Gene Ross over at <a href="http://www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=48665" target="_blank">Adult FYI</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Porn Valley &#8211; I talked to Jack Vegas Thursday night.  In the Mike South pick-a-Wiki sweepstakes, Vegas is now being fingered by some “impeccable source” as the latest culprit behind Porn WikiLeaks.  But, just to make sure he’s got his bases covered, South’s also tagging Keith O’Connor as another co-brains behind Donny Long’s operation.  South’s also been of the opinion that Joe Brandi’s another mastermind behind Porn WikiLeaks. The fact that Brandi has categorically denied such accusations doesn’t prevent South from using the blind man with a Remington 870 Pump Shotgun approach. I.E., you’re bound to hit a target if you keep coming up with names.</em></p>
<p><em>Fact remains, South’s yet to offer proof of any of the allegations.</em></p>
<p><em>Vegas says he’s had issues with a certain male talent who’s apparently South’s “impeccable source”.  “He thinks I fucked him over a couple of days ago. It’s been real petty bullshit. This guy is planning on leaving Los Angeles, and he’s been putting out all kinds of crazy rhetoric,” says Vegas.</em></p>
<p><em>Vegas gives me the probable source&#8217;s name, and I’ll keep it out of this article for the time being.  “He’s [the source] real bitter and he’s been putting the story out there,” says Vegas noting that his girlfriend has been the subject of Wiki-scrutiny as well as good friends Dick Chibbles and Tommy Gunn.</em></p>
<p><em>“All of a sudden this story about Wiki leaks shows up,” says Vegas.  “Now there’s people on Twitter looking for my head on a stick as a result of the Mike South story.”</em></p>
<p><em>Vegas says he’s contacted the guy he suspects as being South’s informant.  “He won’t answer the phone.” Vegas makes a very good point. In the six years that he’s been involved in the business he’s never had a negative thing written about him. </em><em>Which re-emphasizes my point. The person or persons involved in WikiLeaks harbors a grudge against the business.  Vegas has always struck me as a stand-up guy and has always worked at getting along.</em></p>
<p><em>I also go back many years with Keith O’Connor. True, O’Connor’s very capable of masterminding an operation like PornWikiLeaks and he’s taken his lumps in some of the porn forums like www.xxxporntalk.com on other issues.  O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s a true computer savant and knows how to make a ton of money creating websites and using that knowledge. O’Connor was my webmaster when I had TheRealGeneRoss.com, but I know him from way before that.</em></p>
<p><em>Keith’s very knowledgeable about the industry and ran Defiance Films and was also a key man over at Metro for a time. Keith married Taylor Rain and had a kid with her. I assume they’re still together though I haven’t talked to him in awhile.  But Keith’s always been very supportive of my efforts and was a long time advertiser on AdultFYI.  Yes, Keith also loves to gossip it up about the business and stir the pot, but not in a harmful way as to damage people.</em></p>
<p><em>Regarding Vegas, none of South’s conjecture makes sense. And Vegas is telling me because of South’s article he’s already lost employment.  “One of the directors goes, ‘what the hell is this story with Jack Vegas leaking on WikiLeaks? Don’t book him no more.’”  Vegas says the story has damaged his reputation with a few other people as well and he’s contacted a lawyer.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I was going to leave the story there but then something interesting happened to me this morning.  I was on the phone with my grandmother, and we were joking around about something and she said &#8220;thou does protest to much&#8221; and it hit me.  Why didn&#8217;t we see this before?</p>
<p>There is a person out there who despite claiming to have found God and retired from porn, still actively visits and posts on any porn related website that she can find.  This same person invokes the name of God and then says in his name people should go to hell.  Who does that?</p>
<p>But what is most interesting is this person knowingly and admittedly participated in the porn wiki leaks website.  This same person also has publicly released the real life name, address, phone number, driver&#8217;s license number and other related information about someone in our industry.  Actually most recently she has been giving out more than few names and personal information on people in our industry.</p>
<p>During the past who weeks, anyone who has actually attempted to help in regards to the PWL website, she has attacked and verbally abused and in one case even making real life threats to them.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s when it hit me &#8212; she proclaims so much, so loudly that she isn&#8217;t associated with the PWL website, but it&#8217;s like she does it to much.  So much that it seems as if she actually is the one with something to hide.</p>
<h2>Could it be that Monica Foster really is the mastermind behind the porn wiki leaks website?  Or if not the master mind then perhaps a willing and active partner in crime?</h2>
<p>I think there is more than enough evidence to support the possibility.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll however let you draw your own conclusions.  There is enough people right now in the RED SCARE, I don&#8217;t want to add to it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-05-20/the-red-scare-is-among-us-thanks-to-pornwikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Derek Hay Pimping HIV Exposed Escorts?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2011-04-21/is-derek-hay-pimping-hiv-exposed-escorts/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2011-04-21/is-derek-hay-pimping-hiv-exposed-escorts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek Hay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaycee Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Luxury Companion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=19468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very fucked up story appeared today on Mike South&#8217;s website.  You may recall that not to long ago there was a huge HIV scare in the industry.  It turned out the performer who tested HIV positive was a gay for pay performer who also happened to have a very serious girlfriend. Many people reported ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very fucked up story appeared today on Mike South&#8217;s website.  You may recall that not to long ago there was a huge HIV scare in the industry.  It turned out the performer who tested HIV positive was a gay for pay performer who also happened to have a very serious girlfriend.</p>
<p>Many people reported that she was traumatized by the whole thing and ran away from the industry, never to be heard from again.</p>
<p>There was a lot of concern because she didn&#8217;t get tested as everyone else did during this trying ordeal.  Having had repeated unprotected sexual contact with an HIV positive person, as she was his girlfriend, they were all very concerned she might have been exposed as well.  I mean think about it, she had unprotected sex all the time with her boyfriend at the time, who was found to be HIV positive.  So it only makes sense that she could have contracted HIV as well.</p>
<p>So guess where she has shown up?  Derek Hay (aka Ben English) owns an escort site known as the Luxury Companion and <a href="http://www.theluxurycompanion.com/view.php?id=187&amp;gender" target="_blank">she is listed</a> as one of the escorts.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//kacey-brooks-escort.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-19471" title="kacey-brooks-escort" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//kacey-brooks-escort-300x232.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="232" /></a></p>
<p>Speaking of Kacey Brooks<br />
By MikeSouth<br />
April 21st, 2011</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/speaking-of-kacey-brooks-4946/" target="_blank">Mike South</a> &#8211; You remember her, Cameron Reed&#8217;s girlfriend&#8230;..The one who was exposed, via Cameron, to HIV</p>
<p>Well looky here on Theluxurycompanion.com</p>
<p>http://www.theluxurycompanion.com/view.php?id=187&#038;gender</p>
<p>Ya that&#8217;s her&#8230;and who is it pimping her? Who owns theluxurycompanion.com</p>
<p>None other than Derek Hay&#8230;..yup Ben English&#8230;.surprised?  I&#8217;m not.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2011-04-21/is-derek-hay-pimping-hiv-exposed-escorts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some shady shit going down at AIM right now</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-12-09/some-shady-shit-going-down-at-aim-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-12-09/some-shady-shit-going-down-at-aim-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIM Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=18218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South just posted this message that I&#8217;m sure hast to be wrong.  Surely nobody at AIM is really this fucking stupid.  But I could be wrong.  I&#8217;ve seen a lot of stupid shit lately. AIM HAS COMPLETELY LOST THEIR FUCKING MINDS I just intercepted info being passed around by Manuel Ferrara that an AIM ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike South just posted <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/porn-idiocy/aim-has-completely-lost-their-fucking-minds-4427/" target="_blank">this message</a> that I&#8217;m sure hast to be wrong.  Surely nobody at AIM is really this fucking stupid.  But I could be wrong.  I&#8217;ve seen a lot of stupid shit lately.</p>
<div>
<h1>AIM HAS COMPLETELY LOST THEIR FUCKING MINDS</h1>
</div>
<p>I just intercepted info being  passed around by Manuel Ferrara that an AIM employee (Bobby) has set up a  draw station in her home and he is encouraging everyone to go.</p>
<p>ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?</p>
<p>ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID Manuel?</p>
<p>People this is fucking STUPID.</p>
<p>DO NOT DO IT!</p>
<p>Im starting to think they should test people&#8217;s intelligence before  letting them in porn, you have to have more brains than a fucking  rutabega or you cant work in porn. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-12-09/some-shady-shit-going-down-at-aim-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you dancing with the devil?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-08-21/are-you-dancing-with-the-devil/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-08-21/are-you-dancing-with-the-devil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazzers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jules Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=16616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South make a post today that I think everyone should read.  Especially those in our industry, those directly effected by piracy and all those porn stars who bitch about not getting paid as much or making as many movies as before because of piracy and those tube sites.  So before you book your next ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/mike-south-commentary/it-aint-about-piracy-its-about-the-money-4094/" target="_blank">Mike South</a> make a post today that I think everyone should read.  Especially those in our industry, those directly effected by piracy and all those porn stars who bitch about not getting paid as much or making as many movies as before because of piracy and those tube sites.  So before you book your next job with certain people, I just want you to remember what this story says &#8211; word for word.  Because you may very well be working with the same people who are in fact stealing from everyone else.</p>
<p>If you book even one job with these people or have anything to do with them business wise, you are directly contributing to their stealing everyone else&#8217;s content and that means you are helping them fuck everyone else.</p>
<blockquote><p>It Ain’t About Piracy, It’s About The Money</p>
<p>Back in August of 2007 a California Judge awarded 5.4 million dollars to Jules Jordan in a copyright infringement case against a company called Kaytel. The amount was substantially reduced on appeal on the grounds that Jordan had no standing to file the suit.  Yesterday the ninth circuit court of appeals re-instated the original judgement.  At first glance one looks at Jules and thinks good for you man.  But anyone who knows the facts knows this isn&#8217;t about fighting piracy, after all Jules Jordan distributes for Brazzers, whose owners own 5 of the 5 largest tube sites in the world. Tube sites that infringe the copyrights of every single company in this business. Brazzers, in the name of Mansef Inc. is currently under federal indictment on money laundering and other charges.  Additionally Brazzers is facing a civil suit from Pink Visuals in the amount of 6.75 Million dollars for&#8230;you guessed it&#8230;. copyright infringement.  So when this sanctimonious little douche bag starts wrapping himself in the &#8220;I&#8217;m fighting piracy&#8221; flag, remember he is doing way more to enable it than he is to fight it.  Actions speak WAY loader than words.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-08-21/are-you-dancing-with-the-devil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Vivid Girls?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-15/no-more-vivid-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-15/no-more-vivid-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivid Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=15731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a report on Mike South that Vivid has released all of their contract girls.  I mean, well let&#8217;s be real &#8230; they only had two anyway which was Lia and AJ Bailey and rumor has it their DVD sales were beyond horrid. The real stars like Sunny Leone, Savanna Samson, and Hanna Hilton ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a report on Mike South that Vivid has released all of their contract girls.  I mean, well let&#8217;s be real &#8230; they only had two anyway which was Lia and AJ Bailey and rumor has it their DVD sales were beyond horrid.</p>
<p>The real stars like Sunny Leone, Savanna Samson, and Hanna Hilton have long ago moved on.  So really what Vivid did today doesn&#8217;t much surprise any industry insiders.  I mean what did they really lose? AJ Bailey and Lia 37?  Big whooop.  They weren&#8217;t STARS like real Vivid girls and they had no potential to ever really be big stars like so many of the Vivid girls in the past did.  <a href="http://www.fameregistry.com/top_vivid.php" target="_blank"><strong>Here is Fame Registry&#8217;s list of top ranked Vivid girls</strong></a><strong></strong>.  This list was last updated just the other day and look how low AJ Bailey is.  She&#8217;s been a Vivid girl for well over a year now.  She should have at least risen some in terms of popularity.</p>
<p>Here is the rumor I heard.  Steve Hirsch made his money on some big Playboy TV deal.  He personally bank a shit load of cash and since then just hasn&#8217;t really had any interest in continuing to work.  To quote an insider &#8230;. &#8220;<em>He doesn&#8217;t really give two shits about Vivid or anything work related anymore</em>&#8220;.   This seems to be true because they haven&#8217;t even tried to get REAL contract stars for a long time.  I mean how in the fuck do you let someone like Madelyn Marie slip through your fingers?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="no-more-vivid-girls" src="http://www.lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//no-more-vivid-girls.jpg" alt="" width="402" height="211" /></p>
<p>But just as rumors started to swirl that Vivid will close their doors all together Vivid started making ungodly amounts of money on their celeb line.  By this time they already ditched Vivid ALT all together.  They ditched Paul Thomas and then just started doing gonzo shit with B. Skow.  Then the celeb sex business really picked up for them so they kept going with that.  Then Batman XXX came out and they did extremely well with that.  <strong>AGAIN THESE ARE ALL JUST RUMORS.</strong> So the RUMOR is that they just decided to go with what is making them money hand over fist which is a celebrity line of sex tapes like the Kendra movie, a series of big budget parodies, and a few random gonzo movies here and there featuring girls they book like any other studio.  No more &#8220;contract stars&#8221; like they did in the past.</p>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong><a title="Permanent Link to Vivid Releases All Their  Contract Girls A Mikesouth.com EXCLUSIVE!" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.mikesouth.com/uncategorized/vivid-releases-all-their-contract-girls-a-mikesouth-com-exclusive-3944/" target="_blank">Vivid Releases All their  Contract Girls A Mikesouth.com EXCLUSIVE!</a></strong></p>
<p>Expect this trend to continue.  Word is Wicked will be next but the  will keep Jessica Drake and Lupe Fuentes for the time being.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>By <strong>MikeSouth</strong><br />
July 15th,  2010</div>
<p>Vivid, the company that started  the contract girl craze, has released all of their contract girls.</p>
<p>Vivid will no longer be using contract girls.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-15/no-more-vivid-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did XBIZ take a bribe from .XXX?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-08/did-xbiz-take-a-bribe-from-xxx/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-08/did-xbiz-take-a-bribe-from-xxx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=15624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South ran an interesting story today in which he implies the owner of XBIZ took a bribe from the .XXX guy.   The full story is below.  It raises an interesting question &#8230;. when you own a powerful industry only network, can you allow you own personal views to influence your decisions? Why is no ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/uncategorized/a-reader-writes-about-xxx-and-alec-helmy-3922/" target="_blank">Mike South ran</a> an interesting story today in which he implies the owner of XBIZ took a bribe from the .XXX guy.   The full story is below.  It raises an interesting question &#8230;. when you own a powerful industry only network, can you allow you own personal views to influence your decisions?</p>
<blockquote><p>Why is no one writing about the fact that Alec Helmy let Stewart  Lawley join xbiz.net and use the &#8220;Industry-Only Network&#8221; in order to  promote .xxx?  Lawley is &#8220;answering questions&#8221; (See &#8220;The Man Who Would  be the .xxx King) on an XBiz Industry-only network even though, several  years ago, he went to an XBiz show and proudly proclaimed that he is not  part of the industry.</p>
<p><em>I can tell you why.  It is simply because in reality Alec Helmy  supports .xxx. He supported it early on and he still does, no matter  what he might say to the contrary his actions speak much louder than his  words.</em></p>
<p><em>Helmy and I had words one afternoon years ago when .xxx was  coming to a head and it wasn&#8217;t pretty.  I had him screaming at me on my  cell phone, I was highly amused. He was VERY pro .xxx<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>You see Helmy&#8217;s organization ASACP is getting $8.00 for every  domain that Staurt Lawley sells. </em></p>
<p><em> A bribe? </em></p>
<p><em>I say if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a  duck&#8230;it&#8217;s a duck.</em></p>
<p><em>Did Helmy and XBiz sell us out&#8230;.You be the judge of that.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-07-08/did-xbiz-take-a-bribe-from-xxx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Down With a Blaze of Glory</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-02-23/going-down-with-a-blaze-of-glory/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-02-23/going-down-with-a-blaze-of-glory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazzers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=14135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to tell a friend of mine, if you are going to go, go big.  He never did listen but apparently Brazzer&#8217;s fully understands this concept. I was reading an article on Mike South today and if the story is true then Brazzer&#8217;s has decided to just say fuck it and go for gold ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to tell a friend of mine, if you are going to go, go big.  He never did listen but apparently Brazzer&#8217;s fully understands this concept.</p>
<p>I was <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/uncategorized/brazzers-hits-a-new-low-3172/" target="_blank">reading an article on Mike South</a> today and if the story is true then Brazzer&#8217;s has decided to just say fuck it and go for gold and they are no longer hiding their criminal ways.  They are now out in the open, well at least in their members area fully illegally showing movies that belong to companies like Vivid, Wicked Pictures, Digital Playground, New Sensations, Evil Angel and more.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-14136" title="brazzers" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//brazzers.png" alt="" width="356" height="82" /></p>
<p>Here is the full story posted on the <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/uncategorized/brazzers-hits-a-new-low-3172/" target="_blank">Mike  South</a> website.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>It seems that Jules Jordans Daddy Brazzers has reached a new low, if  you can believe that.</em></p>
<p><em>Yup they have a tube site INSIDE the Brazzers pay area, and guess  whose content is on it?  If you Guessed Digital Playground, New  Sensations, Digital Sin, Elegant Angel, Devils Films, JM productions,  Wicked, Vivid, Evil Angel, Jules Jordan Video, First Time Video Girls,   HomeGrown, and pretty much everyone else in the biz, congrats you  guessed right.</em></p>
<p><em>These assholes are the lowest of the low, I hope Pink Visuals burns  them a new one.</em></p>
<p><em>And Jules Jordan…Fuck YOU you little douchebag, for putting money in  these guys pockets so that they can do more of this shit, you are almost  as low as they are.  Almost.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-02-23/going-down-with-a-blaze-of-glory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Playground Cable Channel</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2010-01-28/digital-playground-cable-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2010-01-28/digital-playground-cable-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Playground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=13679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading on Mike South&#8217;s website about the new Digital Playground cable channel coming out soon.  The long and short of it is &#8230;. The channel will be a Pay per view outlet, not a subscription based service and it will be available on pretty much all of the cable TV outlets like Comcast, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/digital-playground/digital-playground-is-coming-soon-to-your-tv-set-3142/" target="_blank">on Mike South&#8217;s website</a> about the new Digital Playground cable channel coming out soon.  The long and short of it is &#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The channel will be a Pay per view outlet, not a subscription based service and it will be available on pretty much all of the cable TV outlets like Comcast, Versizon Fios, AT&amp;T Uverse, COX  and Time Warner. When I asked if it would also be on satellite I was told that hasn’t been announced yet.</em></p>
<p><em>The service will begin offering only Digital Playground titles but in the future, the plans are to license other titles, as long as they comply with Digital Playgrounds strict quality and content standards.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Here is the full article <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/digital-playground/digital-playground-is-coming-soon-to-your-tv-set-3142/" target="_blank">from Mike South&#8217;s website</a> &#8230;.</p>
<p>One of the things I have always admired about Digital Playground is that the companies owner, Joone, is not afraid to leverage technology.  Say what you want but when everyone else was crowing that they were shooting in HD (2 mega pixels) Digital Playground was shooting with the Red 1 cameras at 16 megapixels.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago Digital Playground announced that it was going to be launching it’s own cable TV channel.</p>
<p>Joone was kind enough to answer some questions for me about this.</p>
<p>The channel will be a Pay per view outlet, not a subscription based service and it will be available on pretty much all of the cable TV outlets like Comcast, Versizon Fios, AT&amp;T Uverse, COX  and Time Warner. When I asked if it would also be on satellite I was told that hasn’t been announced yet.</p>
<p>The service will begin offering only Digital Playground titles but in the future, the plans are to license other titles, as long as they comply with Digital Playgrounds strict quality and content standards.</p>
<p>There will be different versions for different carriers as well so if hardcore isn’t acceptable in your area, softer versions will be available. Joone emphasizes that the carrier will choose how hard the version they will offer is, they will also choose whether they carry the standard definition version or the high definition version..</p>
<p>When asked if direct delivery was likely to supplant the old go to the video store model Joone replied, ” I think in this day and age its not about a single format its about giving the consumer options. Some want DVD, some want Blu-ray some want online and some want VOD to their bedroom tv.”</p>
<p>The content will be exclusive, no other VOD (Video On Demand) Branded system will offer it. The release schedule  will follow the Hollywood style of window releasing. Our theatrical has been DVD and Blu-ray and after that window we go into VOD. We want to maximize each window release.</p>
<p>I asked Joone what was the most difficult aspect of bringing this to fruition. “Making blockbuster movies that make money and creating a high end library. At the end of the day the deal was an easy one because we had the right content” was his answer.</p>
<p>Finally I inquired as to what is next for Digital Playground.</p>
<p>“We have our own toy line that we have been working on for the past year lunching in Jan. We did a sneak peek at the Berlin show to a very select group of big distributors and they where blown away by what we have. Whats exciting for me is that these toy buyers see hundreds of toys each week and they really love what we have coming out.</p>
<p>You know what is interesting is for years the Berlin show was about DVDs. This last show I went to it was all about Toys,  and Toys you can not download so there is going to be a need for distributors and stores.” </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2010-01-28/digital-playground-cable-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSC Openly Promotes Shady Company</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-16/fsc-openly-promotes-shady-company/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-16/fsc-openly-promotes-shady-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pointless Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=11034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sure your parents have told you that it isn&#8217;t what you know but who you know and apparently that really holds true for the Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and who they decide to hand out their awards to. For awhile now Mike South has been saying they have issues over there but fuck, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I am sure your parents have told you that it isn&#8217;t what you know but who you know and apparently that really holds true for the Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and who they decide to hand out their awards to.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/category/free-speech-coalition/" target="_blank">For awhile now Mike South has been saying they have issues over there</a> but fuck, who knew that meant they down right smoked fucking crack and took bribes.  Well that has to be the case because it would be the only thing that could possibly explain what I seen today.</p>
<p>In this month&#8217;s issue of <a href="http://www.xbiz.com" target="_blank">XBIZ </a>World we find out that the FSC named Video Secrets their Top Internet Business of the Year.  Not get this part of the award &#8230;&#8230;  they give the award out based on the efforts of the company  to provide consumers, merchants and affiliates and the public at large with an ethical product.  I never thought I would hear the word &#8220;ethical&#8221; associated with Video Secrets unless it was something like name something they aren&#8217;t.   No but seriously, how much fucking crack do the people over at the FTC really smoke?  Video Secrets?  Seriously?</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">So what we&#8217;ve learned today, you don&#8217;t have to actually be ethical to get awards for good business practices &#8230;. just know the right people.  Damn good to know that the company who claims to be working for our best interest has no problem promoting a company that has had such a shady past.</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11035" title="video-secrets" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets.jpg" alt="video-secrets" width="524" height="679" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Video Secrets has been around a long time.  About 13 years I suppose.   If nothing else, you can at least give them that.  Throughout the years they have weathered problems with ownership, employees and rumors of shady dealings and things like very bad conversion ratios, double billing and shaving sales or stealing traffic through leaks.  The rumor of shaving sales has actually come up a lot over the years for Video Secrets.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone has ever proven they are screwing people but the rumor has been around long enough and comes up often enough to really make you wonder.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">On the popular Playboy owned &#8220;GFY&#8221; or Go Fuck Yourself adult forums, a webmaster asked &#8221; <em>Which programs AREN&#8217;T worth signing up to?  I wanna know which cash programs that have screwed people over and haven&#8217;t paid them. Or shave from your sales.</em>&#8220;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy.jpg"><img title="video-secrets-gfy" src="http://www.lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy-300x33.jpg" alt="video-secrets-gfy" width="300" height="33" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The very first post in response included Video Secrets.  But the thread didn&#8217;t just stop there.  Other webmasters would eventually chime in and say things like &#8230;.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;<em>Amen brother, I would soon 404 all my sites and send the traffic to Google than send a single click to Video Secrets.</em>&#8220;  That&#8217;s pretty harsh for a program who just won a awards based on the ethics of their business practices don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-11037" title="video-secrets-gfy-2" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy-2-300x10.jpg" alt="video-secrets-gfy-2" width="300" height="10" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">And yet another webmaster said &#8220;<em>Ain&#8217;t that the truth &#8230;. these guys are scum</em>&#8220;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">These guys are scum?  Do you think that the people over at the Free Speech Coalition bothered to check into the years and years of accusations of wrongdoings by countless affiliates and consumers?  I don&#8217;t personally know if any one claim of fraud or unethical behavior has ever been proven to be true, including the one time rumor that Video Secrets back end affiliate software was created with the ability to manually manipulate affiliates accounts giving them the ability to shave sales, meaning we would just have to trust them not to do it &#8230;. but what I do know for a fact is that after so many years of hearing the same rumors and problems, even if they aren&#8217;t provable, I would think twice before associating myself with these people.   There have just been far to many complaints for there not to be a problem somewhere.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy-3.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-11038 alignnone" title="video-secrets-gfy-3" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//video-secrets-gfy-3-300x51.jpg" alt="video-secrets-gfy-3" width="300" height="51" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But hey, maybe I&#8217;m wrong.  Maybe after all of these years and all of these different complaints by countless affiliates and consumers, they &#8211; the consumers and affiliates are the wrong wrong and maybe Video Secrets really isn&#8217;t guilty of all those things people say about them.  I mean, seriously &#8230; what the hell do I know?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I know these fuckers never did send me my $1200, after my payment supposedly got lost in the mail not once, not twice but an amazing three times &#8230;  but whatever.  Good luck FSC with your ethical company of the year.  It only goes to show, that Mike South apparently was on to something about you guys.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-16/fsc-openly-promotes-shady-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Mike South Supporting Illegal Tube Sites Himself?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-02/is-mike-south-supporting-illegal-tube-sites-himself/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-02/is-mike-south-supporting-illegal-tube-sites-himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=10640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week Mike South was quick to send out a press release about a Playboy owned venture (GFY.com) took advertising money from a company who also just so happens to own a tube site. Mike South besides his own blog, also happens to run a TGP. Basically a TGP site is sort of a ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week <a href="http://lukeford.com/2009-09-30/mike-south-and-friends-say-fuck-you-playboy/">Mike South was quick to send out a press release</a> about a Playboy owned venture (GFY.com) took advertising money from a company who also just so happens to own a tube site.</p>
<p>Mike South besides his own blog, also happens to run a TGP.  Basically a TGP site is sort of a picture post site, where other people submit a gallery of photos on his site and in return he shares in the advertising on that page of photos.  In other words, every submitted photo gallery much include a link back to Mike South&#8217;s TGP site and the owner of the TGP (in this case Mike South) must approve any gallery page submitted.</p>
<p>So anyway the whole point I&#8217;m trying to make is that Mike South and his friends were quick to condemn Eric, GFY and Playboy for benefiting from a company who owns an illegal tube site when he himself is doing the exact same thing.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//mike-south-brazzers.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-10647" title="mike-south-brazzers" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//mike-south-brazzers-300x192.jpg" alt="mike-south-brazzers" width="300" height="192" /></a></p>
<p>Now before Mike South tries the expected response of he didn&#8217;t know, keep in mind that every single post submitted on his TGP has to be approved by him.  As you can see from the screenshot above, the ad for Brazzers is very clear and right under his own name.  You can&#8217;t quite miss that not once but MULTIPLE times.</p>
<p>So who cares if Mike South is pimping out Brazzers?  Well remember earlier this week he called out Playboy / GFY for it.</p>
<p>Brazzers has been shown to be the owners of TrafficJunky (<a href="http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpost.php?p=16368943&amp;postcount=177" target="_blank">see link here on GfY</a>), who works directly with illegal tube sites.  TrafficJunky is the exact same site Mike South is up in arms about for them paying GFY for an ad.  So he is in fact guilty of EXACTLY the same thing he is bitching about.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">So to you Mike South I say POT KETTLE BLACK</h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2009-10-02/is-mike-south-supporting-illegal-tube-sites-himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike South and Friends say FUCK YOU Playboy</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2009-09-30/mike-south-and-friends-say-fuck-you-playboy/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2009-09-30/mike-south-and-friends-say-fuck-you-playboy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playboy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=10566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I got an email with some photos put out by the Playboy owned and operated site RealJanine.com, in which they proudly proclaim it to be Janine&#8217;s OFFICIAL website. The problem is, Janine hasn&#8217;t had anything to do with that website in years, and rumor has it, they haven&#8217;t been paying her any money ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I got an email with some photos put out by the Playboy owned and operated site RealJanine.com, in which they proudly proclaim it to be Janine&#8217;s OFFICIAL website.  The problem is, Janine hasn&#8217;t had anything to do with that website in years, and rumor has it, they haven&#8217;t been paying her any money from the site either.  Janine&#8217;s actual OFFICIAL site, that she endorses, creates new content for and that actually gives her money for her work is FreeJanine.com.  So for Playboy to mislead their consumers if if nothing else at least a little shady, wouldn&#8217;t you say?</p>
<p>Well Playboy also happens to own a website called GFY, for years it was a popular message board for adult webmasters to hang out and talk shit.  Recently they got a new paid advertiser, which just so happened to be a company who also owns an illegal tube site.   This is one of the posted messages in response from the webmasters who frequent the board.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Dear playboy stockholders,</em></p>
<p><em>It has come to my attention that one of playboys assets has been advertising sites that steal its own product and then gives it away. I find it hard to believe supporting sites that give your product away will make you money. Playboy shares have dropped steadily since gfy started advertising sites that directly profit from the theft of playboy content.</em></p>
<p><em>Do you think playboy should take a stronger stance when it comes to who it advertises for ? Do you think playboy should stop supporting these sites ? or do you think supporting these sites that give away your product will improve sales ?</em></p></blockquote>
<p>As you can imagine there was a huge uproar over GFY taking money from a site that not only owned an illegal tube site with tons of stolen content but that also included stolen owned by Playboy and Playboy owned properties.  So here is Mike South and his friend&#8217;s response.</p>
<blockquote><p>We are proud to announce the formation of a new webmaster resource board, www.gofuckgfy.com</p>
<p>When asked why a new board was needed board co-founder Mike South had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Last week gofuckyourself.com decided to slap adult webmasters across the face by accepting advertising from and skinning their site with ads from a company that runs tube sites that steal adult content. At that point I intentionally got myself banned for life by calling them what they are, sell outs and scumbags.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t alone, many of GFY&#8217;s top posters and most influential webmasters pulled advertising and got themselves banned as well.  I looked at this situation and I told DirtyWhiteBoy that we should fuck them back by starting <a href="http://www.gofuckgofuckyourself.com" target=_blank>gofuckgofuckyourself.com</a>.  At that moment we knew it had to be done.  We bought the domains and quickly got gofuckgfy.com up and running.</p>
<p>Truth is DirtyWhiteBoy and Nate deserve all of the credit, they worked all night to make the board look and feel familiar to GFY users, even to the point that we can restore your post count.</p>
<p>We want all of GFY&#8217;s participants to come join us and make this the industry&#8217;s best resource board, after all it is he posters that make a board like this successful and we welcome you all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed gofuckgfy.com has barely been up twenty four hours and has already attracted such luminaries as Dean Capture and Gonzo and is already over 100 posts and growing by the minute.</p>
<p>Reading the rules on the board kind of sums up the atmosphere.  The rules are &#8220;Use common sense&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2009-09-30/mike-south-and-friends-say-fuck-you-playboy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is This The New Jesse Jane?</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2009-08-24/is-this-the-new-jesse-jane/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2009-08-24/is-this-the-new-jesse-jane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Playground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janie Summers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=9456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike South is reporting that Digital Playground recently signed a new starlet of which they have renamed to Janie Summers. This virtual unknown started in the business in 2009 as Heather Starlet doing only girl on girl or solo / masturbation type work then seems to have merged over into the girl / girl stuff ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/digital-playground/heather-starlet-new-dp-girl-a-mike-south-exclusive-2885/" target="_blank">Mike South is reporting</a> that Digital Playground recently signed a new starlet of which they have renamed to Janie Summers.  This virtual unknown started in the business in 2009 as Heather Starlet doing only girl on girl or solo / masturbation type work then seems to have merged over into the girl / girl stuff recently.  Digital Playground recently lost Stoya and now <a href="http://lukeford.com/2009-08-08/is-rio-valentine-faking-her-pregnancy/">if the story of Rio Valentine getting pregnant</a> just after signing on with Digital Playground, that makes it a huge problem for DP with the AVN show coming up in just a few months.  They will be short on girls to sign for them.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9462" title="heather-starlet" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//heather-starlet.jpg" alt="heather-starlet" width="400" height="600" /></p>
<blockquote><p><em><a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/digital-playground/heather-starlet-new-dp-girl-a-mike-south-exclusive-2885/" target="_blank">Mike South says </a> : Got a good tip today that Digital Playground just signed ultra cute Heather Starlet to an exclusive contract.  This isn’t surprising  everyone knows DP is looking to fill the hole left by Stoya, who was being groomed to be the next Jesse Jane.  What surprising is that even though Heather is a relative unknown she does have a pretty large body of work out, but then so did Katsuni.  Her DP name will be Janie Summers…You heard  it here first though!</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So does this cute little blonde have what it takes to be the next Jesse Jane as Mike South suggested?  I guess only time will tell.  But I will tell you one thing, she can take one hell of a big fucking dildo.  Look at that shit in the picture below, which I found on her site HeatherStarletBlog.com.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9461" title="Heather-Starlet-2" src="http://www.Lukeford.com/luke-ford-images//Heather-Starlet-2.jpg" alt="Heather-Starlet-2" width="450" height="677" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2009-08-24/is-this-the-new-jesse-jane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike South 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lukeford.com/2009-07-22/mike-south-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://lukeford.com/2009-07-22/mike-south-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rayzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukeford.com/?p=8001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who have a kindle can now read the Mike South on your kindle. He is charging $1.99 a month to read his site from your kindle. This seems to be the first ever adult only blog approved by Amazon. The Amazon Kindle is a software and hardware platform developed by Amazon.com for ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who have a kindle can now read the Mike South on your kindle.   He is charging $1.99 a month to read his site from your kindle.  This seems to be the first ever adult only blog approved by Amazon.</p>
<p>The Amazon Kindle is a software and hardware platform developed by Amazon.com for reading e-books and other digital media. Three hardware devices, known as the &#8220;Kindle&#8221;, the &#8220;Kindle 2&#8243;, and the &#8220;Kindle DX&#8221;, support the platform, as does a popular iPhone application called &#8220;Kindle for iPhone&#8221;.</p>
<p>Active in the adult industry for over 16 years now, MIKE SOUTH is a two time Adult Video News Award-winning producer and director. He was best known for his ongoing series of pro-am XXX videos featuring first-time performers, many of whom &#8211; including names like Anna Malle, Melissa Hill, &#038; Felicia Fox &#8211; went on to enjoy adult industry stardom. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002I9Z01A" target=_blank>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002I9Z01A</a> is the direct link to the product. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lukeford.com/2009-07-22/mike-south-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

